The Spider's House

Nina Allan's Homepage

Page 8 of 64

Corona Crime Spree #12: Laura by Vera Caspary

Yellow hands slid coffee cups across the table. At the next table a woman laughed. The moon had lost its battle with the clouds and retreated, leaving no trace of copper brilliance in the ominous sky. The air had grown heavier. In the window of a tenement a slim girl stood, her angular dark silhouette sharpened by a naked electric bulb.

When glamorous advertising executive Laura Hunt is found shot dead in her apartment, the crime instantly sparks shock and outrage among her friends and admirers. Suspicion falls initially on Laura’s fiance, Shelby Carpenter, constantly short of money and a known philanderer. But what of Waldo Lydecker, cantankerous older writer and possessive friend of Laura whose feelings for her may run deeper than the innocent affection he professes. Detective Mark McPherson, whose cynicism about women would seem to grant him the objectivity he needs to crack the case, finds himself drawn against his better judgement under the dead woman’s spell. A twist in the tale around its halfway point gives this neat whodunit an extra edge of mystery I was not expecting.

I am constantly surprised and delighted by how skilfully made these works of classic noir often turn out to be. Laura displays a beautiful economy of style and purpose, with the alternating points of view providing a well judged change of pace. There is extra interest to be found in Caspary’s feminist take on classic tropes. The author subtly reveals the way in which those who gossip about or try to solve the murder cannot seem to help – consciously or otherwise – pinning the blame on Laura herself, on her ‘lifestyle’ as an independent woman who has the temerity to enjoy nice things and who earns more than her dithering fiance. (Vincent Price’s Shelby Carpenter is the high point of the famous movie adaptation, which looks stunning but whose script is flat and rather lifeless and not nearly as intelligent or nimble as the original novel.)

Vera Caspary is no Patricia Highsmith but then who is? For fans of classic crime, Laura is well worth your time, and Lydecker’s section especially boasts some admirable writing. An absorbing afternoon’s read from a writer whose life story is every bit as fascinating as that of her heroine. I’m always interested in noir novels written by women and I’m glad to have finally caught up with this one.

Island

At 15:45 tomorrow my story ‘Island’ will be the Short Works afternoon reading on Radio 4. The story will of course be available to listen to on the BBC Sounds app afterwards.

Radio 4 has been a mainstay of my cultural life since the age of ten, and seeing my name in the Radio Times feels like a significant moment, so I hope everyone who listens to it enjoys the story!

‘Island’ had something of an interesting genesis. The story’s main character, Janet, was the protagonist of an earlier version of my current work-in-progress. As many of you will know by now, I tend to discard vast tracts of material in the course of writing a novel, but as I have always stressed, no part of that process is a waste of time. Janet, and ‘Island’, are proof of that. It’s such a thrill to know she is around still, that her life on the page continues.

My huge thanks to producer Eilidh McCreadie, who commissioned ‘Island’, and to Alexandra Mathie for her beautiful reading.

Corona Crime Spree #11: The Treatment by Michael Nath

Style is not disguise, it is imaginative transformation, even sorcery. It turns people, actions, into other forms, even calls them into being; then the reader is interested neither in what was there before, nor whether anything was there at all, only in what she/he is seeing, hearing, feeling now.

(Afterword to The Treatment, Michael Nath)

The question that looms largest in my mind after finishing The Treatment is how come Michael Nath isn’t better known?

As you no doubt know by now, I am constantly on the lookout for novels that do interesting, subversive, experimental things with genre, that demonstrate a belief that is strong in me, that it isn’t what you write, it’s how you write it. A feel for language, a desire to communicate, a powerful sense of empathy, a joy in the formal possibilities of words on the page – any of these can turn base material into literary gold. Luckily for British crime writing, Michael Nath has all the above, and more.

The Treatment follows journalist Carl Hyatt, who some years before the novel opens made the mistake of riling up a dodgy property developer named Michael Mulhall. The end result of this misadventure is that Carl gets fired from his job on the G**** (a left-leaning broadsheet we all know which one) and winds up working for the Chronicle instead, a free local newspaper that has big ambitions but zero resources.

Unsurprisingly, Carl is unable to let go of his resentment of Mulhall, and a chance encounter during a holiday in Spain leaves him with the simmering suspicion that there may be more to the story even than he realised. He has promised his wife Karen that he’ll steer clear of trouble – but Carl’s lingering horror over a crime that took place in the neighbourhood two decades before leaves him no option but to investigate further. Was Mulhall linked to this crime and if so, how? And what might be done to bring the remaining original perpetrators – still walking free – to justice?

Carl’s belief in putting his money where his mouth is is all well and good as an ideal – but what if it gets people killed? The Treatment examines questions of decades-long guilt, the morality of revenge, and the relative worth of truth in a landscape where the pursuit of that truth is liable to put those closest to you in mortal danger.

The bare bones of this novel might be the bones of any one of a hundred contemporary crime novels. The substance of this book is unlike any other crime novel – or novel, period – I’ve yet encountered. There is frequent mention of the playwright Christopher Marlowe, murdered in a tavern in Deptford (The Treatment takes place mainly in southeast London, which as a former resident of that neglected parish would be recommendation enough in itself) and these references are no accident – if I’m sure of anything about this novel it’s that Nath does nothing by accident. The vigour, the fruitiness, the rambunctious, squalid life of this teeming text – the heightened register of language, which has at the same time the music of street slang with all its contemporary resonance – kept reminding me of Marlowe’s Faustus, of Webster’s sordid revenge tragedies, of the blood and guts of Elizabethan London, so little different, in essence, from own own.

It’s a big book (500 pp) and very dense. The novel opens with a cast list as extensive as Tolstoy’s in War and Peace – but don’t let that put you off. In fact, you won’t need the cast list because this book is like a soap opera you might have stumbled upon mid-season: tricky to work out what’s going on for the first half hour or so but stick with it and you’ll find yourself addicted before you know it. The novel’s time-frame is dizzyingly fluid, dipping back and forth between the present, the immediate past and the cusp of history, elusive and mercurial. You might feel like you’re running to keep up on occasion, but Nath’s sure-footed virtuosity in the handling of his material means the moment will come when you’re swept up in the action, flipping pages to find out what happens like your sanity depends on it.

For lovers of true crime literature, The Treatment is equally indispensable as a unique and visceral response to the twisted and troubled aftermath of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, an examination of systemic racism, an evocation of London society and culture on the cusp of great change. The Treatment is Shakespearean in scope, Dickensian in potency, Joycean in technical ambition.

The Treatment is Oldboy down the Old Kent Road. It’s a piece of work. Dive in.

Ten books I am looking forward to reading in 2021

I know there are some readers who lay great emphasis on the first book of the year, choosing it with care as the embodiment of an omen for the reading year to come. I see my own first reading experiences of a new year as being rather more chaotic and akin to foraging: a series of experiments through which I ask myself questions about my current reading, whether and how it reflects my goals as a writer, what I’m looking for in my reading in the months to come. I still have clear memories of the first part of 2020, which appropriately enough for the season was entirely dominated by the Golden Age detective fiction I was reading in preparation for a talk I was due to give (and did enjoy giving – luckily it was scheduled a couple of weeks before the lockdown). How peculiarly cosy that time seems now, itself a kind of metaphor for the country house mystery, in which the guests gather and chat before the feast with no idea of the danger that is about to overtake them.

Just after New Year this year I happened to reread a piece by Steve Michelmore of This Space (so much more than just a book blog) in which he talks about ‘axe books’, a term he has coined inspired by words from Kafka on the importance of demanding more from our reading and from ourselves when we read:

We ought to read only the kind of books that wound and stab us. We need the books that affect us like a disaster. We need books that grieve us deeply, like the death of someone we loved more than ourselves, like being banished into forests far from everyone, like a suicide. A book must be the axe for the frozen sea inside us.

I find this not only powerful and true, but incredibly helpful to my thinking around what books mean to me. In listing his own favourite experiences from his year in reading, Michelmore restricts himself to just three titles and I love this, too – we should all be so thoughtful.

Like so many other readers and writers, I have been enjoying the lists and blog posts and videos about books that are due to be published in 2021. I actually began compiling a document entitled ‘Books 2021’ sometime in October and at the time of writing I have already listed thirty-seven titles I am interested in as well as another twenty or so that I somehow missed in 2020. I know from experience though that it would be a mistake to see this initial selection as being prescriptive. Any selection of books that reads too much like a ‘to do’ list is liable to acquire similar connotations of duty, and leaves less room for one’s reading to evolve organically, which for me at any rate it always does.

Thinking about this, and thinking about the concept of axe books in particular, I have decided to list just ten here – ten books published in 2021 I would definitely hope to have read by the end of 2021. Careful readers will note that I am cheating from the off, as my list actually includes two books that were released late in 2020 and that I absolutely need to have. I intend to try and write something about each of my choices here, as and when I get to them. So, listed in the order of publication, here are my ten most anticipated books of 2021:

Red Comet: the short life and blazing art of Sylvia Plath by Heather Clark (October 2020). I don’t think I’ve talked about her much on here as yet, but Sylvia Plath has been huge in my life since I first read Letters Home and Ariel at the age of fifteen. I have read more than a few previous critical and biographical works, but every review I’ve come across says that Heather Clark’s book, long in the writing and making use of previously unavailable material, is close to being definitive, so it’s a must-read for me.

The Sea View Has Me Again: Uwe Johnson in Sheerness by Patrick Wright (December 2020). I discovered this 800-page beast via the White Review’s best books of 2020 (a quite remarkable selection and definitely my favourite of the best-of lists this year) and fell in love with the idea of this book on the spot. Author Patrick Wright talks in detail about the genesis of his project here, and I can already sense that this will be the kind of reading experience that acts as rocket fuel for the imagination.

A Swim in a Pond in the Rain: in which four Russians give a masterclass on writing, reading and life by George Saunders (January 2021). See this lovely interview with Saunders here for more detail about this one. I actually feel quite emotional about this book, which sounds as if it could have been written specifically with me in mind. I will be particularly fascinated to see how my feelings, perceptions and ideas around these stories have changed and evolved since first becoming obsessed with Russian literature in my teens and twenties. I am hopelessly out of date now on new work by Russian writers, and revisiting some of the classics will I hope give me the kick up the arse I need to put that situation to rights.

Lean Fall Stand by Jon McGregor (April 2021). I adore McGregor’s work. Reservoir 13 is still one of my favourite novels of recent years. This new one sounds equally brilliant and I can’t wait.

Second Place by Rachel Cusk (May 2021). Along with many others I’m sure I have been eager to see how exactly Cusk would follow her landmark Outline trilogy. Only a couple of months more to wait until we find out!

Monument Maker by David Keenan (June 2021). David Keenan is a must-read author for me now, one of Scotland’s most gifted contemporary writers. I heard him speak extensively about his writing practice last February at the Argyle Street Waterstone’s in Glasgow – the penultimate book event I attended before lockdown and hugely inspiring. (This wonderful podcast interview offers something of the flavour of that event.) Monument Maker is another big beast – 900 pages, I think – but its historical theme (an exploration of European cathedrals) would seem to mark it out as a significant milestone for Keenan and I’ve been looking forward to this book since I first got wind of its existence a year or so ago.

Intimacies by Katie Kitamura (August 2021). As with Reservoir 13, Kitamura’s anti-detective-novel A Separation remains a recent reading highlight and I was thrilled when I heard her next novel was on the way.

Checkout 19 by Claire-Louise Bennett (September 2021). Bennett is one of the most experimental of the extraordinary generation of writers currently living and working in Ireland and I look forward to this, her second novel, as a potential reading highlight of the autumn.

The Magician by Colm Toibin (September 2021). And talking of Ireland, here’s Colm ‘The Master’ Toibin with a novel inspired by the life and work of Thomas Mann. If you can have axe books, you can have axe writers, and Mann is one of mine. I cannot wait for this. I may also use it as a prompt to finally catch up with Erika Weiss’s biography of Mann’s two eldest children Klaus and Erika, In the Shadow of the Magic Mountain, which has been on my to-read list ever since it came out in 2008.

The Waste Land: T. S. Eliot, Ezra Pound and the Making of a Masterpiece by Matthew Hollis (November 2021). As important to my writing life and thinking as Sylvia Plath is Eliot’s The Waste Land. I found Hollis’s biography of Edward Thomas (another formative influence) to be superb and this new book on Eliot and Pound sounds essential.

I feel properly excited about all these books, and choosing only ten (even with three whoppers among them) gives me a fighting chance of reading them all. I hope to keep blogging semi-regularly this year, with more instalments of Girls Against God certainly, as well as new projects and matters of interest as and when they arise. I am thinking I might try blogging the Gordon Burn Prize longlist again this year as I found it a most rewarding exercise in 2019. Let’s see what crops up!

2020: a year in reading

I bang on about this every year I know but for me December really is the cruellest month. It’s not the cold so much as the dark, which is why I’m already feeling my spirits lift a little even in advance of hogmanay as we pass the winter solstice and there is the merest perceptible hint of lengthening evenings. Christmas this year felt different too – so much quieter and in keeping with the season somehow, a time of reflection and abatement rather than the month-long blaring insanity of conspicuous consumption. We were lucky of course, my mum and Chris and I, the three of us together for a lovely lunch and our usual post-pudding Scrabble tournament. I am so sorry if you didn’t get to see your relatives this Christmas.

I remember the final few days of 2019 as the days in which I read Ben Lerner’s The Topeka School. This is a novel whose clarity and strength of achievement felt to me at the time like a point of anchorage, a steel tent peg pinning down the tail-end of December, an intellectual full stop, bringing the reading business of the year to a satisfying close. It feels weirdly appropriate to be closing out 2020 with two short novels that are akin to The Topeka School in that they are the work of two post-post modernist writers roughly of the same generation as Lerner and similarly in the process of cementing and furthering their considerable gifts. Yet in their expression of liminal uncertainty, their ghostliness, their sense of hiatus these two books are the polar opposite of Lerner’s and perfect analogies for 2020, a year in which everyone waited, everything stopped.

All of which is my long-winded way of sneaking two extra books into my top ten reading highlights of 2020, David Keenan’s Xstabeth and Eimear McBride’s Strange Hotel, both strangely beguiling yet achingly sad, both novels of ineffable loss, both daringly innovative books from writers I admire tremendously and intend to keep keeping up with as new works appear. As for the rest, here they come, listed in the order in which I read them. I remember last year my top picks were chosen according to which books happened to have scored 10/10 on my own highly subjective and no doubt weighted book-score-ometer. This year I am varying the selection criteria slightly by going for the ten books that for whatever reason have stuck around to pester me. Many of these will have scored 10/10, though not all of them. Similarly not all the books I read in 2020 that did score top marks have made the final cut.

  1. The Glass Hotel by Emily St John Mandel. This was my first 10/10 book of the year and it took its time coming. I loved Station Eleven but The Glass Hotel is even better in my opinion, confirming Mandel as a writer whose next work I would be eager to pick up without knowing anything about it in advance. Whenever I think of The Glass Hotel I think also of Mark Haddon’s The Porpoise, which had a similar effect on me in being the kind of well made, imaginatively vast, gorgeously surprising book that depends on nothing but its own vision, its own surety of purpose, its own beautifully deft exploration of its guiding principles. The Glass Hotel is set around the time of the 2008 financial crash, but it speaks profoundly to our own time. A novel to reread and to treasure.
  2. Under the Volcano by Malcolm Lowry. I was thrilled to read this finally, a twentieth century classic that has been on my to-read list so long I was beginning to feel guilty every time I thought about it. As it turns out, Under the Volcano is everything everybody says it is: a masterpiece by any definition, The Waste Land in novel form. A cacophonous, parched, desolate, insane, stupendously beautiful, stiflingly oppressive work, a memoir of failure, tragedy and one moment of immortal triumph snatched from the wreckage. The experience of reading this book seemed interminable at the time and I never exactly looked forward to rejoining the consul but once back in his world the sheer power of Lowry’s language and vision proved irresistible. For all the copious amounts of alcohol consumed by almost everyone in it, Under the Volcano is no drunken outpouring; the form of the book is restrained and disciplined – weirdly, it kept reminding me of Ford Madox Ford’s The Good Soldier, another modern classic I took a long time getting to but that changed my world. The literary allusions, the doublings, the assonances reveal in Lowry a knowledge and feeling for literature that echoes that of Nabokov. What. A. Book. It reaffirmed my faith and rekindled my resilience. If you need your appetite whetted further, do check out the Backlisted podcast discussion on Under the Volcano – it’s fantastic.
  3. Minor Detail by Adania Shibli. I think this is the shortest book on this list but it is massive in scope. The uncanny clarity, the sense of dread and doubt that characterises Minor Detail make it unforgettable and in places actively frightening while you are reading it. The dual form it takes – the first half an historical crime narrative, chillingly rendered, the second part an autofictional investigation of that crime, fraught with nerves and doubt and the potential for harm – is itself the perfect metaphor for a land divided. Reading Minor Detail, one senses the author’s personal investment in a literary project that is more to her than just a project, it is a matter of justice. I felt privileged to read it and will be looking out Shibli’s previous work.
  4. Nudibranch by Irenosen Okojie. This most recent collection of shorter fictions by Okojie has to be her most accomplished work yet. The power of the stories – who can forget ‘Grace Jones’, winner of this year’s Caine Prize for African Writing? – is more than equalled by the revelatory, revolutionary quality of the writing itself. Nudibranch was another book that felt tough to get to grips with on occasion but repaid every effort. It is a joyous thing, to see a writer so audacious, so in command of her powers. I am eager to see more attention being paid to black and minority-ethnic writers at the experimental end of fiction; happily Okojie is in their vanguard.
  5. Katherine Carlyle by Rupert Thomson. I don’t just love this book, I am in love with it, all the more so because it burns slowly. I found the protagonist deeply irritating at first; gradually I became one with her. Was it Russia, was it Svalbard, was it the haunting, irresistible power of Thomson’s writing? The ending is so beautiful, so moving, so perfect. Thomson has to be one of the UK’s most criminally underappreciated writers. I will be reading Katherine Carlyle again and it might – just – be my favourite book of the eighty-eight I read this year.
  6. The Old Drift by Namwali Serpell. Winner of the Clarke Award 2020 and bravo to the judges for coming to their senses and plucking this gorgeous rose from the thorns of that crazy shortlist. This novel is huge in both page-count and scope and some effort is required especially in the early stages to keep all the characters and their familial connections straight in your head. But keep the faith and you’ll find yourself beguiled and bewitched by a novel that is as intelligent as it is vast and that entirely lives up to its ambitions. One of my favourite aspects of The Old Drift is the extent to which it fulfils the radical potential naturally inherent in science fiction literature. More simply and less contentiously, The Old Drift is a great novel, one that deserves to stand the test of time. A modern masterpiece.
  7. The Ministry of Truth by Dorian Lynskey. I will always associate this book with being on Jura, the birthplace of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, the novel that is the subject of this creative, vibrant and keenly insightful piece of literary biography. It is lucky I read The Ministry of Truth on Kindle as any physical copy of the book would have ended up with asterisks and stars and underlinings on every page. Lynskey’s powers of analysis – the ways in which he is able to draw a seventy-year-old work into potent, sizzling dialogue with our own time – are as commendable as the clarity and inclusiveness of his writing. It might sound odd to say it, but for me at least The Ministry of Truth was a real page-turner, a book I devoured in just a couple of days before diving into a reread of its subject-matter. I am happy but not surprised to report that it, too, scored a resounding 10/10 on my dodgy book-ometer.
  8. Born Yesterday: the news as a novel by Gordon Burn. Burn said in an interview that he hoped this novel would ‘bring back 2007’ to anyone reading it say twenty or thirty years in the future. Reading it in 2020 is a strikingly weird experience, not just because it does exactly that – I guarantee the events of that summer will feel instantly, eerily present to anyone who lived through them – but because of the way we have all ‘felt’ the news this year in a manner strikingly similar to that employed here, with a moment-by-moment immediacy that lends every individual, normally commonplace event the power of hyperreality . Born Yesterday is a powerful antidote to so much of the contemporary fiction we are told is ‘timely’ and ‘important’ but that is actually an empty construct, and I loved this book with my whole heart. Whenever I read Burn I find myself bitterly regretting his premature death, his keenly-felt absence from our literary lives. He challenges and inspires me like no other writer.
  9. The First Stone by Helen Garner. Another of my literary idols. The First Stone landed Garner in a pile of controversy back when it was first published in 1995 but that just goes to show how necessary a work it was and remains. What a brave, remorselessly self-examining, curious, questing, prescient book this is (I am guessing Garner’s own description of the ‘intellectual openness’ of US academe is making her laugh out loud right now). Should the point need stressing (as depressingly it probably does) whether one agrees with the stance Garner takes at the beginning of The First Stone is immaterial; what matters is Garner’s desire to interrogate a question as objectively as possible, to examine evidence, her honesty in doing so, her refusal to be cowed or bullied, her constant openness to the possibility that she might be wrong. I listened to a podcast interview with Eimear McBride recently in which she stressed that the one duty of the writer is not to be simplistic. That, in essence, is the true subject of The First Stone and it is impossible for me to overstate how much I appreciate Garner’s project, her writing, the force of her literary personality as expressed through it.
  10. The Inland Sea by Madeleine Watts. And talk of the devil, I came to Watts’s debut novel through an essay she published this year on the diaries of Helen Garner! (I love how these matters of interest so often join up.) The Inland Sea is a powerful, unusual and often discomfiting first novel that combines climate anxiety with memoir, a nation’s unsettled past history with the imminent near-future. The story of John Oxley and his search for Australia’s non-existent inland sea is compelling, dark and strange. The protagonist’s day-job as emergency services dispatcher offers a weird symmetry. Watts’s writing is sensitive and unsparing and her characters – Pat, Clemmie, Maeve and Lachlan – all spring vividly to life. As with all the best books, I was left feeling hungry for more and I cannot wait to find out where Watts goes next.

In spite of all obstacles and even because of them, 2020 has proved to be a fascinating, sustaining and fulfilling reading year for me, one in which the purpose and importance of reading has been stressed and re-stressed, the consolation, inspiration, energy and purpose that reading brings has been doubly precious. Next week and for my first blog post of the new year, I want to look forward into 2021 to some of the books I am particularly keen to be reading in the coming months. Until then, Happy New Year everyone – and take care out there.

2020: a year in writing

I am intending to post again next week with a rundown of the books that have most captured my imagination in 2020, but before that I thought I would share some words on how this strangest, most disorientating of years has played out within the context of my life in writing.

Many more years will need to pass before we can begin to accurately assess the full impact of 2020 – personally, politically, socially, environmentally. Until we are able to gain some distance, what we have is a combination of memory-flashes, baseline anxiety and news-montage. Chris and I live on a Scottish island and this fact alone has helped us withstand much of the practical awfulness of living through a pandemic: low population density, low incidence of the virus in the community, ample and safe opportunities for spending time outside, generosity of spirit and considerate adherence to the official guidelines from all who live here. We have also felt the unexpected benefits of being used to relative isolation: yes, we were completely locked down on the island for four months (and look set to be again any day now), but being lucky enough to work from home we were able to find a new routine and a sense of purpose even in spite of the restrictions. Not being able to travel brought its own strange benefits. As the winter comes on, we speak reassuring words to each other about not going across to the mainland much at this time of year anyway – even under normal circumstances, the clash of weather and ferries can make the threat of being stranded something of a deterrent.

We have friends down south who have contracted the virus but thank God none of them have suffered severe complications. The person closest to me who has been most impacted this year has been my mother. She has had her elective surgery cancelled twice, and with the current uncertainties around January lockdown – how severe will it be, how long will it last? – it is more or less impossible to estimate or discover when her operation might be rescheduled. My mother is an incredibly resilient person and has been remarkably upbeat through most of this year, but to see her in pain, her mobility increasingly affected is both worrying and upsetting. We understand there are many, many others in a similar position or worse, and here again we have much to be grateful for: my mum lives on the island, we have formed a social bubble/extended household and so I can spend time with her whenever I want to. Had she still been living in Cornwall, we would not have seen each other all year and as someone who suffers from anxiety she would have felt increasingly isolated.

Of course there are thousands of families, separated at this moment, who are not nearly so fortunate.

Though we have all of us come through this year together, seen and felt and cataloged its proliferating anomalies in a kind of Greek chorus of accelerating strangeness, each and every one of us will have experienced 2020 differently. Much of my own anxiety has been abstract, political, ambient: I am now middle aged, finally fully engaged in the work I love and cherish and was born to do and possessed of the kind of temperament – driven, obsessive – to be able to keep doing it even in spite of the mounting uncertainties. We are in a co-dependent relationship, my work and I, so it is lucky that we strengthen and encourage each other rather than engaging in mutually assured destruction. In terms of my own mental health and personal anxiety, certain years of my twenties, thirties and forties have been far harder to bear than this one. Had the events of this year taken place a decade ago, my situation – emotional, practical, financial – would have been very different.

This is something I remember and think about all the time, as I think about and internally rail against the myriad ways in which the government response to the epidemic – incomplete, uncoordinated, politically compromised as it is – has worsened the crisis, deepened social divisions and created an environment in which so many individuals and communities will find it even harder to recover.

If I were to try and articulate the feelings that have predominated and continue to define this year for me I would speak of existential nostalgia (in the Tarkovskian sense) for certainties that never existed, a constantly thrumming anger at the way political expediency has been granted ascendancy over societal need, a heightened, calamitous awareness of the entropic instability of the universe at large.

There is no doubt these fears and concerns have affected my writing, not in the matter of my ability to write but in my uncertainty over what might be relevant and what might be enough. At the beginning of 2020 I was well into the first draft of a new novel. I remember being fairly happy with the way it was developing, although that seems like a long time ago now, an isolated period now marooned on the further side of an insurmountable time-barrier. As the first period of lockdown came into being, I had just begun to write a portion of the narrative that was linked to yet discrete from the main body, an embedded text of the kind I love to create and that in this case immediately became suffused with all the anger and fear and disorientation of those first unbelieving weeks of the pandemic.

I redrafted this section recently and found memories of that time flooding back in a disturbing way. I am glad to report that this story has survived through to the current version of the novel in all its furious weirdness. The rest of that first draft was not so lucky. As I finished writing the embedded text and emerged again into the main stream of the narrative, everything about it felt wrong, insufficient, out of sync with my current thinking. It did not help matters that I suddenly became obsessed with pandemic literature – not zeitgeisty zombie apocalypses but older texts, writing that had arisen from the anxieties and social concerns of the time of writing: Camus’s The Plague, Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year, Katherine Anne Porter’s Pale Horse, Pale Rider. I now have a file of notes on all these and more, which I am sure is going to come in useful for some future project and that I fully intend to return to but caused me nothing but trouble earlier this year as I tried to knit some of these strands into a narrative already burdened with too many conflicting areas of interest.

I ended up dumping the lot, all 60,000 words of it. Discarding words is an inconvenience I have grudgingly learned to accept as a part of my process. I felt much better for having made this decision but starting completely from scratch brought its own problems and the novel had to undergo another heavy-duty realignment before assuming the form it now has, a form that finally bears some resemblance to what I have in mind. The draft currently stands at 68,000 words. I have another 20,000 words or so to write (some already drafted, the rest new material) at which point I will have what will amount to a complete working draft. This will then need to be redrafted as a continuum, the part of the process I find most rewarding (not to mention something of a relief) and that transforms the pile of dog-eared pages into a book.

This has seemed an incredibly trying, vertigo-inducing process at times. It has also been exciting, rewarding, thrilling, testing my abilities, stretching my ambitions and posing difficult yet energising questions about the kind of book I want to write, the direction I need to take, the type of writer I am endeavouring to become. It is both discomfiting and uniquely satisfying, to know that as a writer the answers to such questions are already within you. That as the writer of this particular book, you are the only one who can solve its problems.

I am hoping to have those problems solved, to the best of my ability, sometime during the first quarter of next year.

I am also happy to report that while all this was going on I also managed to complete two pieces of short fiction and draft most of a third story, to be delivered in March.

I feel incredibly lucky to do what I do, to love what I do, to be fit and well enough to do it to the best of my ability. If anything, the challenges and sobering insights of 2020 have redoubled my commitment to my work, re-ignited my passion and gratitude for the talent of others, reaffirmed my conviction that art absolutely matters. I hope that everyone reading this is able to find some joy, comradeship and peace this festive season, as well as the hope of better days to come. Stay safe, everyone. And see you back here next week for my best of the year.

Girls Against God #5: A Ghost in the Throat by Doireann Ni Ghriofa

It would probably be more apposite to file this stunning work of autofiction under ‘Girls for God’ as its central endeavour constitutes nothing less than an act of literary resurrection.

The narrator (who seems not at all unlike Doireann ni Ghriofa herself) is on a journey of self discovery. Determined to pursue a career in medicine, she finds herself profoundly unsuited to the work and following a crisis that results in a traumatic personal breakdown she gets married, becomes a teacher and starts a family. Being a mother to children – the climactic state of being pregnant and giving birth to children – proves to be the deepest source of spiritual sustenance and self-realisation, as well as an increasingly destructive addiction to self-relinquishment, to the immoderate sacrificing of her own thoughts, desires and ambitions to the needs of others.

The narrator finds the idea that she is a writer actively threatening. This was never what she planned for herself. She proceeds with stealth. Focusing on her dissatisfaction with the extant translations of a work that has always been of central importance to her thinking about the act of writing, she begins to investigate the life and history of Eibhlinn Dubh Ni Chonaill, the composer of the eighteenth century epic poem The Keen for Art O Laoghaire. The Caoineadh is a work that holds key significance in Ireland’s school curriculum and literary canon, yet its author – Eibhlinn herself – has always had her identity subsumed in that of her famous nephew Daniel O’Connell, who fought for the emancipation of Catholics in Ireland and was finally allowed to take up his seat in the Westminster parliament in 1829.

Eibhlinn, our narrator discovers, has been rendered more or less invisible by the male historians who painstakingly charted Daniel’s life and works. Yet still she is everywhere, the ghost that haunts, her love-song for a murdered husband an insistent, life-affirming heartbeat that comes increasingly to possess and obsess her. As she drives across rural Ireland searching for traces of Eibhlinn, however meagre, our narrator begins to work on her own translation of the Caoineadh, an act that will lay her own ghosts to rest at last and offer her a new assurance in her poetic vocation.

Doireann Ni Ghriofa is a prizewinning poet – A Ghost in the Throat is her first work of prose fiction – and poetry’s rhythms and recursive themes, both her own and Eibhlinn’s, inform every line of this original, tactile, intelligent and fiercely compelling work. Part detective story, part memoir, part treatise on the poetic life, A Ghost in the Throat interrogates the concepts of self-sacrifice and longing from a female perspective, offering insights and revelations that are both clear-eyed and merciless, passages that will move you to tears. This book, like a benevolent ghost, will return to haunt you. The work closes with Ni Ghriofa’s full translation of the Caoineadh in parallel text with Eiblinn’s original.

You can (and please, please do) watch an interview with Doireann Ni Ghriofa here. She is in conversation with the writer Megan Nolan, whose own debut novel Acts of Desperation is out in March.

Girls Against God #4: Things We Lost in the Fire by Mariana Enriquez and You Will Never Be Forgotten by Mary South

Reading these two story collections back-to-back presented an eerily similar aesthetic experience to my encounter with Geen and Ferrante last week, only in reverse. Both collections deal with social change, buried secrets and personal crisis. Both employ elements of the fantastic to secure their effects. Yet the manner of approach, the mode of attack could not be more different, with the internal temperature of these stories, above all, providing a fascinating contrast.

Enriquez’s stories (translated from the Spanish by Megan McDowell) take place against the shifting, unstable backdrop of dictatorships past. In ‘The Intoxicated Years’ we follow a group of teenagers as they confront issues of identity, addiction and sexuality in the years following the fall of the Peron regime. The political repercussions and personal reckonings that preoccupy their parents are to their children a matter of intense dullness, of ‘yeah, whatevs’; set against the agonies of teenage angst, the adult world even in its moment of greatest precariousness feels tedious, played out, irrelevant. Only as they grow older do they begin to understand how no one can live surrounded by such a society and emerge unscathed.

Other stories come populated more literally with ghosts from the past and monsters of the present, and Enriquez’s manner of merging the bitterest social commentary with elements of horror – see ‘Under the Black Water’ for a Lovecraft-tinged death cult (this story carries strongly resounding echoes of Clive Barker’s ‘The Forbidden’ aka Candyman) and ‘The Neighbour’s Courtyard for a hideously unsettling variation on the zombie story – is brilliantly handled. The stories’ boldness in confronting issues of violence against women is, for me, the strongest, most vital aspect of this collection. Women here struggle not only against weak, bullying husbands and cowardly fathers, they have the whole machinery of systemic machismo to deal with as well:

How many times had a cop like this one denied to her face and against all evidence that he had murdered a poor teenager? Because that was what cops did in the southern slums, much more than protect people: they killed teenagers, sometimes out of cruelty, other times because the kids refused to ‘work’ for them – to steal for them or sell the drugs the police seized. Or for betraying them. The reasons for killing poor kids were many and despicable.

My personal favourites among these stories are those in which the horror is less overt, where the line between the uncanny and the everyday is most cunningly hidden. ‘An Invocation of the Big-Eared Runt’ follows a tour guide as he entertains tourists with tales of the city’s most notorious murderers and serial killers, among whom the eponymous big-eared runt is most notorious of all, most especially because of the studied delight he seemed to take in the crimes he committed. As Pablo becomes ever more obsessed with the runt, the more the strain of his home life seems to tell on him. The story’s final lines are chilling, all the more so because they are inconclusive. The collection’s tour-de-force is ‘Spiderweb’, in which a young woman tied to a peevish and controlling husband goes on a day trip with him and her extravagantly charismatic and forthright cousin Natalia. Juan-Martin’s nagging and complaining is a constant irritation, and when their car breaks down on the return journey a reckoning seems at hand.

The landscape, atmosphere and tension of ‘Spiderweb’ are reminiscent of stories by Roberto Bolano in which the threat of violence, ever-present, hovers just out of sight. As soldiers of the regime torment a waitress at the neighbouring dining table, Juan-Martin’s unwavering sanctimoniousness threatens to push the threat over the edge towards calamity. Natalia though has her own ideas on how to deal with Martin. Once again, this story is all the more effective through leaving the reader to draw their own conclusion.

After the heat, dust and sweltering tension of Enriquez, I found the atmosphere of Mary South’s stories chilly at first; studied, beautifully turned and just a little too careful. I have seen other critics reference the SF TV series Black Mirror in their assessment of this debut collection, but the more I read of You Will Never Be Forgotten, the more this description seemed too pat, too obvious, and not wholly accurate. It is only really the first story, ‘Keith Prime’, that recalls Black Mirror, not to mention Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel Never Let Me Go, and in spite of being (as are all the stories) beautifully written, it is the one I find least interesting, precisely because its minimalist, soft-sci-fi tropes have been rehearsed before. South makes overt use of science fiction again in ‘To Save the Universe, We Must Also Save Ourselves’, in which the messy real-life dramas of actor Faith Massey are set against the unswerving heroism of her screen incarnation, Dinara Gorun, captain of the spacecraft Audacity.

Fans of the movie Galaxy Quest will find themselves chuckling happily along, and the story leaves no doubt it is doing its own thing by placing Faith’s battle with entrenched sexism – the most indestructible monster she has faced both onscreen and off – front and centre. Far stronger though are those stories in which South turns away from convention and pushes hardest against the boundary between the disdainfully ironic and the overtly uncomfortable. ‘Frequently Asked Questions About Your Craniotomy’ starts out reading like a conventional ‘list’ story but gradually strays into territory that is both horrific and heart-shattering. ‘Architecture for Monsters’ follows a journalist-fan of the groundbreaking architect Helen Dannenforth as she works to uncover the inconvenient truths at the heart of a genius’s life and art. ‘The Promised Hostel’ is, in common parlance, something of a mind-fuck, also a great story, while the title piece ‘You Will Never Be Forgotten’, in which a content moderator at ‘the world’s most popular search engine’ seeks to confront her rapist, is equally bold and ambiguous.

If South’s collection seems to lack the visceral, palpable urgency of Enriquez’s, this could well be down to the fact that I read the two books so close together. The elegance of South’s writing, the smooth turns from the domestic-banal to the queasily unnerving, her unswerving examination of aspects of the way we all live now makes You Will Never Be Forgotten well worth seeking out, and leaves the reader in eager anticipation of what South will write next. As for Mariana Enriquez, I understand her next novel is shortly to appear in English translation and I cannot wait. In the meantime, I would urge you to take an hour’s break to watch this conversation between Enriquez and M. John Harrison at this year’s (unavoidably Zoom-based) Buenos Aires Literary Festival. The insights into their writing lives, literary process and aesthetic outlook are many, varied and scintillating. Well worth your time.

Girls Against God #3: The Days of Abandonment by Elena Ferrante and What You Could Have Won by Rachel Genn

The whole future – I thought – will be that way. Life lives together with the damp odour of the land of the dead, attention with inattention, passionate leaps of the heart along with abrupt losses of meaning. But it won’t be worse than the past. (The Days of Abandonment, Elena Ferrante)

Encountering these two books back-to-back provided an extraordinary reading experience. Both are superb. Each tackles a broadly similar subject matter but from a wildly different angle. For two novels covering tangentially allied themes, they could hardly have been more different. For anyone doubting the radical potential of works that focus intimately on human relationships, Ferrante and Genn tear down the curtain, revealing the stormy truth of the adage, ‘the personal is political’. What talent and drive.

In What You Could Have Won, we follow the unequal, tormented relationship between Henry, a psychiatrist engaged in research into addictive behaviours, and Astrid, a newly minted superstar who (the author has affirmed) is loosely based on the (phenomenally talented and tragically deceased) singer and songwriter Amy Winehouse. The narrative switches point of view along a disjointed timeline as we observe Henry’s jealous machinations against various colleagues, his depersonalised fascination with Astrid and his use of her – putting it bluntly – as a kind of lab rat.

Astrid is dazzled by Henry because he appears to be so solidly in control. We follow her terrifying ordeal at the Burning Man concert and subsequent escape (with Henry) to a Greek island, we observe her treatment at the hands of ‘hypno Ray’, a cultish rehab guru with some strange ideas about personal boundaries. As Henry and Astrid’s timelines interweave, our involvement – our acquiescence? – deepens. Reading What You Could Have Won is like watching Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf: you feel you’re eavesdropping on private trauma, something you were not supposed to see, and yet you have to see the drama through to its conclusion.

The experience of reading Ferrante’s The Days of Abandonment (translated by Ann Goldstein) is hardly less bruising. Olga is a writer living in Turin with her two children Illaria and Gianni and her husband Mario. After supper one evening, Mario announces that their fifteen-year marriage is over, that the relationship has ceased to have meaning for him. Olga is first bewildered and then increasingly devastated, at a loss as to what has precipitated Mario’s act of abandonment. Mario does that cowardly thing men do – insists ‘it’s not you, it’s me,’ before finally admitting he’s been having an affair. Not just any old affair, either, but the continuation of a relationship that began five years earlier. Olga feels she has, in effect, been living in an alternate reality.

As her grip on her new reality loosens and threatens to collapse, the pressure of trying to carry on as normal becomes increasingly onerous. Her behaviour, once restrained and conservative, becomes more and more untrammelled. Her children, caught in the crossfire between their warring parents, are forced towards a self-reliance that is inappropriate for their young age. For Olga, whose friends seem to have deserted her for the calmer, more glowingly temperate shores of Mario-and-Carla (seriously, I cannot imagine a better book about the realities of divorce), the future feels impenetrable – until a crisis intervenes.

What I have enjoyed most about my time with these two novels is the fascinating clash of registers. What You Could Have Won contains some of the most intelligent, close-grained writing I have encountered all year. For a novel that takes personal trauma as its central subject matter, the tone (almost in a Rachel-Cusk-like way) tends towards the abstract, even abstruse. You have to reach to engage, to dig for the emotion – but once you connect with it, the strength of feeling and power of description is both soul-shaking and mind-grabbing. The switch to first person in the final chapter – and what this means for Astrid – is a genuinely cathartic moment, and the fact that this is achieved through literary device makes it all the more satisfying. Genn’s construction work is careful, knowing and ingenious yet it is fuelled by passion – both for her story and for the written word – and I would expect to see What You Could Have Won strongly in contention for next year’s Goldsmiths.

The Days of Abandonment is so upfront in its treatment of raw emotion – so confronting in its portrayal of mental pain – it can be harrowing to read. And yet this concise, searing account of personal dissolution and restitution is about as far from a conventional ‘relationship drama’ as you might wish it to be. As Olga spirals out of control, Ferrante employs what might be called a storm of language, torrential word-power to evoke her distorted perceptions, for as it turns out, Ferrante’s novel is as much about addiction and altered states as Genn’s. There are passages of hallucinatory rage that spiral off into the abstract, an analysis of consciousness and affect that approaches the philosophical. As with Genn, Ferrante’s endgame is one of transfiguration and catharsis. Olga’s new understanding of love is more astringent, based in self-reliance. The toxic enchantment is broken, the creative life replenished with a newly-found trenchancy.

Girls Against God #2: Boy Parts by Eliza Clark

I read this and I thought: this book should win prizes. This book should be at the very least longlisted for the Women’s Prize for Fiction. But I bet they’re not brave enough.

Irina Sturges is a photographer. She studied at Central St Martins and then went on to do a postgraduate course at the Royal College of Art. She found her time as a student in London confronting, confusing, exhilarating and ultimately destabilizing. She has an eating disorder, a coke habit and a very guilty conscience. She has been passionately in love yet determined to sabotage her own happiness. She finds it almost impossible to relate to people other than by exploiting them. Back home in Newcastle, she is doing fairly OK professionally through online sales and her edgy, transgressive imagery has brought her a massive Instagram following. When she gets a call from a gallery in Hackney interested in putting on a retrospective, Irina goes into a tailspin, belief in her work vying with the ever-present, ever corrosive urge to self-destruction. As she sorts through her back catalogue of images, we gain insights into her process, as well as glimpses of the terrible act that brought her to this point of imminent crisis.

What’s to say about this excoriating, impassioned, incisive debut other than go read it? Is it possible for me to say I liked Irina? Put it this way, if I’d lived in a student house with her I would have been the tedious bore making cups of tea, scrubbing the KFC stains off the carpet, putting out the bins and banging on about how she should be eating proper meals. Her work though I get, her intelligence I respect, her ambition I admire. While there will be some who read Boy Parts and understandably feel repelled by Irina’s abrasiveness and misanthropy, for me the most horrific part of what can often be an uncomfortable narrative to read is what happens to Irina at the gallery and afterwards: her experience of marginalisation and eye-watering prejudice, her own uncertainty over the crime that might be a delusion, a fundamental break with reality brought on by mental and emotional collapse.

What actually happened? There are clues but they are inconclusive. Like all the most satisfying novels, Boy Parts leaves us free to make up our own minds. Whatever else this novel is, or might be, it’s a brilliant dissection of objectification and how women making art, especially women from disadvantaged backgrounds, are perceived. Clark’s loose, colloquial style is both a perfect evocation of a particular zeitgeist and a cannily contrived screen for some excellent examination of artistic process and superbly evoked weirdness.

Boy Parts is bold and dark and strikingly ambitious – just like Irina. It is also very, very funny. I loved it a lot. I’m already looking forward to whatever Clark dreams up next. In the meantime, you can find out more about the background and inspirations for Boy Parts in this author interview.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 The Spider's House

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑