Nina Allan's Homepage

Category: year of reading weird (Page 2 of 5)

Girls Against God #1: Girls Against God by Jenny Hval

Jenny Hval’s prickly second novel turns out to be the perfect place to begin my current reading project, because Girls Against God is a confronting text in every sense. At the surface level, the novel poses as an autofictional account of a young woman growing up in the stiflingly religious, provincial atmosphere of southern Norway. Raging against a society that presents a whiter-than-white face to the world whilst harbouring and nurturing attitudes of racism, intolerance and petit-bourgeois philistinism, our narrator finds a focus for her rebellion through the world of black metal music and its aggressive iconoclasm. Her passionate desire to ‘be in a band’ allies her with two other like-minded young women, Venke and Terese. Together they flirt with various styles of performance and expression, entwining their musical experimentation with the practice of modern witchcraft. They begin to think of themselves as a coven, an irritant in society’s gut, a literal ‘trash stench’.

The timeline jumps between the narrator’s schooldays and her years at college to residencies in London and New England to a moment in the near-present in which an older version of the narrator is engaged in the making of an experimental film. Girls Against God rejoices in filmic imagery and references. Derek Jarman makes an appearance, and Dusan Makavejev’s ultra-transgressive 1974 film Sweet Movie is referenced and analysed before being partially re-enacted in a scene of phantasmagorical weirdness in a school canteen. The Blair-Witch-like film Forest, whose description and analysis forms the third part of the novel, is both a metaphor for the book as a whole and a marvellous act of ventriloquism; Hval is able to translate the elusive visual language of film to the written word with remarkable acuity and power.

There is still more to be had from this book, though. Girls Against God reads almost as a polemic, a manifesto – Hval’s examination of the taboos around women’s self-expression, the persecution of ‘witches’ (and witches) and the authoritarian suppression of individual acts of rebellion and protest is the cold steel, the anger that gives this narrative its resonance. As a piece of weird fiction that places passages of memoir alongside strange slides into hallucinatory otherness and sublime terror, this book is unique, The Craft on LSD. As a record of the slow commodification of Nordic Black Metal, Girls Against God works as a fascinating piece of documentary. As a rebel yell, a scream of protest in the endless white night of Norwegian summer, it is lacerating, eloquent and exhilarating.

The novel goes still further in examining the nature and purpose of writing itself in breaking down atrophied systems and challenging norms. I especially admired Hval’s juxtaposition of the forest interludes with her startling and imaginative use of the electronic sounds (text tones, old dial-up modem sounds, skype calls) that make up the ‘cosmic internet’, a parallel natural history, a modern cosmology.

Impassioned, original and revelatory, Girls Against God is a dense, occasionally stubborn book that rewards the effort involved in reading it. Hval opens up the possibilities of fiction, fusing together music, image and thought in a web of text that is refreshing and inspirational in its integrity. One to keep.

Tricks and treats

As an opportunity for partying and dressing up as the Witchfinder General (I really do need that cloak) it looks like Hallowe’en is pretty much cancelled this year. All the more reason then to bake some skeleton cookies and curl up on the sofa with a favourite horror movie or a volume of ghost stories (or indeed both).

Luckily for all of us, there is some wonderful new gothic reading to be had, and as a Hallowe’en treat this year I am delighted to recommend a brand new anthology I’ve just finished reading. It’s called HAG (because of course it had to be) and is subtitled ‘forgotten folk tales retold’. As a concept it is wonderful: ten contemporary women writers offer their own take on some of the more obscure regional folk tales of the British isles. We’re all familiar with retellings of popular fairy tales such as Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast or The Little Mermaid, and there are some superbly innovative interpretations out there. But the stories in HAG are different: obscure and often remembered only in the particular part of Britain from which they originate, they offer microcosms of rural life from the time when they were first being told. The Britain that emerges from these tales is a place of dark magic, eerie transformations, fairy mischief and supernatural retribution. As with so much British weird, landscape often plays a central role in these stories, grounding the magic firmly in a reality that is stark and dangerous to navigate.

The original folk tales that inspired HAG are reprinted in full, together with an introduction from Carolyne Larrington that sets the stories in context, examining the influence of fairy tales on our national literature, then and now. It is this kind of attention to detail that helps to make HAG such a magical book and a genuinely informative one, a project that clearly means a great deal to everyone involved with it. And yet to experience the power of this anthology in its purest form, I would recommend that readers leave the original tales and the excellent introduction to one side until they have finished reading the stories themselves. Each of the ten new stories offers a brilliantly original modern interpretation of an old, old tale, its own world of magic and beauty and occasionally terror. Each one is radically different in style and form, and although it’s a cliche to say it, there really is something here for everyone.

The standout story for me is Daisy Johnson’s ‘A Retelling’, based on the old Suffolk tale ‘The Green Children of Woolpit’. I loved the blend of autofiction and fairy tale, the one segueing seamlessly into the other to create an unsettling yet ultimately transcendent effect. (Reading this story reminds me I really do need to grab myself a copy of Johnson’s new novel Sisters.) Stories by Naomi Booth, Natasha Carthew and Imogen Hermes Gowar (so painful to read but bravo that ending!) offer their own delights, and I deeply appreciated Eimear McBride’s tongue-in-cheek subversion of the entire brief. The wonderful thing about HAG though is that every reader will find their own favourite story. Needless to say, this book, which has one of the most beautiful covers I’ve come across this year, would make the perfect Hallowe’en gift.

Hallowe’en is a time of transformations, and in this light I would also like to recommend Wild Time, a short novel by the writer, artist and performer Rose Biggin in collaboration with her partner Keir Cooper. I know Rose – we have appeared in several anthologies together – and I was intrigued to see what she would do with a longer-form narrative. Rose is boldly experimental in her theatre work, and I am delighted to say her latest project is every bit as daring, not to mention fabulously entertaining.

Wild Time takes as its template what is possibly Shakespeare’s most popular and well known play, A Midsummer Night’s Dream. One of the most remarkable aspects of this book is the way it honours its source material: the bawdiness, the humour, the word play, the theatrical chaos – they’re all here, all mined knowingly and inventively and to delightful effect. As in HAG, the reinterpretation of the characters and situations to fit a modern idiom is expertly handled (Titania, Queen of the Fairies, sweeping along the platform at Bank station was a particular highlight for me and a moment I will no doubt remember with affection when I eventually get the chance to visit London again). The authors’ willingness to be bold and innovative in terms of language and form adds extra verve, and their understanding of and appreciation for theatre in every sense of the word results in a work that almost demands to be adapted for the stage. Take note, Wild Time contains some pretty explicit action, shall we say, though the poetry, humour and sheer joy with which these erotic elements are handled is refreshing and beautiful (and may indeed leave some readers opting for an early night :-)) Wild Time is a lovely book, and one that will raise a sorely needed smile as these dark days encroach.

For those daring a walk in the woods this Hallowe’en, let me heartily recommend as a companion to their trip Aliya Whiteley’s The Secret Life of Fungi, an exploration of the kingdom of mushrooms and Whiteley’s first non fiction book.

Readers familiar with Whiteley’s novella The Beauty (and if not, why not?) will already have more than an inkling of her interest in mycology. The Secret Life of Fungi takes us deeper into her world, unearthing facts and folklore around fungi that will offer something new to even the most seasoned enthusiast. Beautifully written, this book is an intensely personal narrative, tracing Whiteley’s interest in fungi from childhood walks with her father through to her continuing fascination with these mysterious life forms in the present day.

As you might expect from Whiteley, there is some lovely nature writing here, evocations of landscape that will stir a personal response in every reader. Above all, one gains a sense of going on a journey – of accompanying Whiteley both on her walks and in her contemplation. This is a book that throws up more questions than answers and I love it all the more for that. For those who cherish books as physical objects, The Secret Life of Fungi is exquisitely made and conceived and like HAG, would make a beautiful Hallowe’en or even Christmas gift.

As the Scottish winter closes in on us yet again, we take comfort in the fact that we wouldn’t be visiting the mainland much at the moment in any case. Very much on the up side, there’s plenty of reading and writing going on, and I’m hoping to begin a new winter blogging project before the end of November. In the meantime, I hope you’re all doing well and staying safe, and here’s to Hallowe’en, a time of change, transformation, and gratitude for the landscape, artistic creations and people that fuel our imagination. For ourselves, we’ll be settling down tomorrow evening with the 1989 Nigel Kneale adaptation of The Woman in Black. Fondly remembered, unseen for thirty years – let’s hope it holds up!

Ruby Resplendent!

Today sees the UK publication of the brand new Titan edition of my book Ruby, formerly known as Stardust: the Ruby Castle Stories. (US readers will have to wait a week or two for this release but have no fear, copies are on their way.)

Ruby is a cycle of stories centred around the figure of Ruby Castle, a horror movie actor who ends up in prison following the murder of a lover. Through a series of shifting glimpses, we learn not only Ruby’s story but the stories and intertwined fates of those in her orbit. There’s a circus story, an alternate-Russia story with cosmonauts, an island horror story, a full-on piece of folk horror – in fact you could almost call Ruby a journey through the weird.

This new edition, which has been thoroughly revised and re-edited, also contains an extra story I wrote specifically to celebrate the book’s reissue and that I hope casts extra light on the fate and character of Ruby herself.

This book is very dear to me, for many reasons. I felt deep personal involvement in the stories at the time I was writing them, and the process of reappraising and revising them for new readers has been a real pleasure, offering many moments of surprise and recognition as I renewed my acquaintance with the varied cast of characters.

There’s a distinctly autumnal feel to Ruby – something about carnival in general, I think – and this October publication date feels particularly appropriate. So here’s to Ruby, at large in the world – I hope you grow to love her as much as I do. Huge thanks to Gary Budden, whose idea this was, and to Cath Trechman and the amazing team at Titan who brought the project to fruition.

Weird Wednesdays #2

She was thirsty and hungry. Her skin was cold. She shivered a little. There was an aching in both knees, as if her body had retained the memory of covering miles and miles. She peeked through the gaps in the carriage: more lightly frosted pathways, the silhouettes of dark candlesticks in the windows of large houses, pale people with strange formal clothing that seemed to restrict their movements somewhat, particularly the women. Her eyes swam. She thought back to waking after seeing a man’s hands reaching for a large wooden chest, folding her naked limbs into it, tossing it in choppy white waters, the chest tumbling inside the sea while she screamed. And the sea’s creatures floated above the coppery lock and chain, bright and bewildered, as if something had been lost in translation.

This is a passage from ‘Zinzi from Boketto’, the penultimate story in Irenosen Okojie’s most recent collection Nudibranch (2019) and possibly the best carnival story I have ever read. This section in particular reminded me of Sergei Loznitsa’s 2018 movie A Gentle Creature – the night journey sequence of course, but more generally Loznitsa’s sparing but potent use of speculative elements, which positions his film right on the boundary between the speculative and the mimetic, a kind of dream-reality, or nightmare reality – because it is at this juncture also that Nudibranch seems to be sited.

This book. As with Fernanda Melchor’s Hurricane Season earlier in the year, my relationship with Nudibranch did not begin smoothly. I was finding it difficult to gain traction with it, kept getting the sense that everything was too disjointed, words for words’ sake, that the stories were deliberately eluding me, slipping away down the cracks in the pavement.

Okojie’s use of language was so good I knew this was my fault, not hers, that I was doing Nudibranch a disservice by reading snatches of it late at night when I was too tired to focus properly on what the writer was doing. I began again, making sure to read at least one story in full at each sitting, and bringing the approach that always works for me when I’m finding a text difficult to get to grips with: I started by reading the stories as if they were poems, relaxing my demand for ‘meaning’ in favour of a more instinctive response to the language in and of itself.

It was like a door opening. Less than halfway through the book I realised I was utterly gripped by Okojie’s vision, and by the time I finished Nudibranch, I knew it to be a book I would always want with me, a desert island book that contains so much in terms of both style and content you could keep reading it once a year for the next decade and never get tired of it. Like you could with Bruno Schulz, or Julio Cortazar.

As with both those authors’ works, the incredible thing about Nudibranch is that it combines powerful and intensely moving human drama with stylistic and linguistic experiment of a masterful order. This combination of narrative power with formal innovation is what writing is for me, basically, the aim, the goal, the ambition. And to see that ambition so successfully achieved in Nudibranch did actually move me to tears. I am so glad I read it, so glad it exists.

As speculative fiction, Nudibranch is important because it not only shows what is possible in terms of pushing the genre envelope but also because it reveals the inherent porousness of everyday life, the frequency and power of our daily interactions with the weird, their propensity to be transformative.

The Abbey was a carcass of its former self, its high walls reduced to mere remains. The sound of cars on the roads around it was jarring, alien. Mouth dry, barefoot, he stood slowly, noting the curfew tower in the distance. Exits at either end of the gutted green gladiator-like pit beckoned. He decided to take the exit in front rather than the one behind him. He crossed some stone steps before landing in the graveyard. St Margaret’s Church stood to his right behind the tower a short walk away, bearing a flimsy white banner that said Cafe Open. People passed him, throwing curious looks. Their clothing appeared odd and unfamiliar. He ran his hands over a few gravestones. The rough stone was cold to the touch. {‘Filamo’)

Literary and cultural allusions bloom magically in the midst of the text, bright and familiar flowers amidst a forest of the strange. The power of these stories to tear a hole in societal assumptions, to reveal inequality, to point to commonality – their political activism forms an inalienable part of their richness, their capacity to delight, surprise, terrify and occasionally enrage.

And so Berlin.

I like its slower pace. I like that I could cut a record here incognito and nobody would give a fuck. I could disappear in as much as a black man in Berlin can fly under the radar. I like some of the old memorial architecture, the Turkish areas, the cafes, the bakeries that pop up frequently. Every other person rides a bike. They have content expressions cycling through the city, their corner of a flattened atlas. I watch. It’s a kind of meditation. I search for the scars of breaks just below the surface of skin. I contemplate the dichotomy of how black men really are and how the world expects us to be, how difficult it is to breathe between the tropes that come at you, the roles already written. I think of my own break before Berlin, tectonic plates shifting. {‘Komza Bright Morning’)

For anyone who thinks these stories might be ‘too difficult’ or ‘not quite their thing’, I would urge them to try ‘Grace Jones’, or ‘Cornutopia’, or – possibly my own favourite – ‘Komza Bright Morning’. This story, which forms a beautiful counterpoint with the Kevin Barry story set in Berlin that I read and loved earlier in the year, contains no overtly speculative elements and yet seems to hover, like all the stories in Nudibranch, perpetually on the boundary between the seen and the imagined, the lived and the dreamed.

A talisman of a book, Nudibranch leaves me simultaneously in awe of and headily inspired by the huge and important talent that is Irenosen Okojie.

I have also been reading Broken Places and Outer Spaces (2019), Nnedi Okorafor’s memoir of the spinal surgery that left her temporarily paralysed, her subsequent recovery and journey to becoming a writer.

As a child, Okorafor was a talented athlete who in spite of suffering from scoliosis competed in tennis tournaments at national junior level. In school, she was drawn towards the sciences, with her passionate interest in insect life pointing towards a future career in entomology. At the age of nineteen, Okorafor underwent an operation intended to correct the curvature of her spine. The surgery did not go as planned however, and soon after coming round from the anaesthetic Okorafor was told she would probably never walk again. The battle to regain her mobility left Okorafor feeling isolated and traumatised, the path of her ambition permanently altered:

On the tennis court, there were days when I could see through time. It happened most times when things got really heated. Something inside me would align. The tennis term for this heightened state of being is ‘treeing.’ It is when you are playing out of your mind, when you can do no wrong, when you can make the universe yield to your every whim. I know it sounds intense, because it is. When I treed, sometimes I could predict the future. Not that far, about one second. I’d know exactly where my opponent was going to hit the ball because I’d see it happen right before it did. It was just enough time to make use of the knowledge.

Even before I began to write science fiction, though I didn’t know it, I was sci-fi.

I was lucky enough to see Nnedi Okorafor interviewed by Tade Thompson at the Harrogate Eastercon in 2018. I was especially delighted to learn of Okorafor’s passion for the world of invertebrates, which chimed so exactly with my own I felt instantly on her wavelength. I found her affinity for language and for speculative ideas equally inspiring.

Most traditional science fiction depicts a white world where I was not able to freely exist. But in the science fiction of what I’ve come to call ‘African futurism’ (which is somewhat similar to Afrofuturism, but is specifically and more directly rooted in African culture, history, mythology and perspective, where the center is non-Western), my characters inhabit worlds in which I can fight, play, invent, run, leap and fly.

Okorafor is without doubt one of the key voices in contemporary science fiction, and I hoped Broken Places and Outer Spaces would give some extra insight into her working methods and her writing life more generally. In the Afterword, Okorafor tells us about the many revisions and substantial cuts the book has been through since she first started writing it in 1994, just weeks after her botched surgery, and I can’t help wishing she had been a little less brutal with the carving knife.

Broken Places and Outer Spaces was published as a companion piece to Okorafor’s 2017 TED talk on African futurism, and the book seems deliberately designed to echo the approachable, inspirational nature of these popular short lectures. In her TED talk, Okorafor states that ‘science fiction is one of the greatest and most effective forms of political writing’, and she has certainly proved the truth of this in her novels and stories. Her power of expression and originality of approach to science fiction makes spending time in her real world all the more rewarding, and the book would have benefited from more background detail, more insights into her family, more specific commentary on her own work. I would have liked Broken Places to show more of the expressionism and imaginative daring that is so present in her fiction. As it stands, it feels too much like the TED talk it has been paired with, and I can only hope that Okorafor will revisit the memoir form eventually, at greater length and depth.

I was fascinated to read Octavia Butler’s story Bloodchild (1984), winner of both the Nebula and the Hugo for best novelette. Butler writes in a bracingly clear, muscular style that carries the reader effortlessly along, and for me this story had the feel of the kind of 70s and early-80s science fiction that first drew me into the genre. I was reminded in particular of a story by Kristine Katheryn Rusch about a young alien female living secretly among humans (I can’t for the life of me remember the title!) which shared similar themes of co-operation and accommodation between aliens and the human colonists who first arrive on their planet.

Butler has said that Bloodchild is not about slavery. I don’t entirely buy that – my gut reaction to the queasily unequal relationship between the Tlic and their human hosts, the service the human hosts are forced to perform directly as a result of that inequality makes it difficult for me to interpret the ‘symbiosis’ between human and Tlic as a fair exchange, and to describe it as a love story – as Butler specifically does – is going waaay too far for me. But I greatly enjoyed Butler’s afterword to the story, in which she talks candidly about her own feelings concerning Bloodchild’s themes and motivations, describing how the story was written partly as an antidote to her horror of botflies and their parasitic life cycle. ‘When I have to deal with something that disturbs me as much as the botfly did, I write about it. I sort out my problems by writing about them,’ Butler says. going on to give a fascinating account of her response to the Kennedy assassination. I love these kinds of insights into a writer’s world and work, and this encounter with Butler left me eager to get to Parable of the Sower sooner rather than later.

To wind up the week, I also had the pleasure of reading Vajra Chandrasekera’s most recent story ‘The Translator at Low Tide‘, published in the May edition of Clarkesworld:

Eesha is a little younger than me, I think, but her hair is still gray. Her library is just one medium-sized room with a few thousand books piled up. I browse through them every week and have grown familiar with these stacks that don’t change. They are like acquaintances I nod to. I’m comfortable with them. They make no demands on me that I can’t answer, but more than that, I know there is no crisis that could make them turn on me, cut me out, leave me to die. You can’t say that about people anymore. There is always some threshold, some hard limit to friendship, to solidarity, even to kinship.

This story reads less like science fiction and more like someone’s real-life journal entries from the year 2060. I’ve never read a story by Chandrasekera I didn’t like, and ‘The Translator at Low Tide’ shows how the depth and fluency of his art continues to increase. I find it interesting to consider this story in conjunction with Ballard’s The Drowned World. Some of the images stand close together but the prevailing moods of the two stories make them quite different. What you have in Ballard is a kind of manic laissez-faire, let it all burn. Chandrasekera shows what life might actually be like if it did all burn. I love both stories and I find value in both approaches but at the time of reading Chandrasekera’s story feels harder-edged, offering none of Ballard’s wilful escapism, and is more frightening as a result.

You can read a recent interview with Vajra here. He says he’s working on a novel. I cannot wait.

Weird Wednesdays #1

This past week I have mainly been reading John Crowley’s 1979 novel Engine Summer. It seems incredible that this book is now forty years old. It might also explain why, several times while reading it, I found myself thinking about John Christopher’s The White Mountains (1967), which for me has something of the same atmosphere, with Rush and Will’s quests and voices not so very dissimilar, and which I would probably have been reading for the dozenth time more or less exactly as Engine Summer was published.

Engine Summer is not what you would call an easy read. From the first page it is elliptical, self-concealing, with a sense not so much of the mysterious as the actively mystical. I enjoy tricky books a great deal, but I became aware early on that Engine Summer was setting itself up to be the kind of novel I don’t normally get on with at all – I’m not keen on fabulism, as a rule, and Engine Summer is not only fabulistic, it is at least partly about fabulism. As it turned out, I not only adored Engine Summer but now feel profoundly grateful to it. For being one of those texts that come along, periodically (and they always do) to jolt me out of my disillusionment with the science fictional mode, to remind me that no matter what kinds of arse might be going on in the community at any given moment, no matter how derivative so much of what is written can begin to seem, there will always be a through-line of texts that create and sustain the field, that provide the intellectual and aesthetic roughage to enliven and stimulate and further the conversation.

And what a stunning, humane, enlightening text Engine Summer is. What liberties it takes with our patience, always rewarded. Crowley’s handling of the post-apocalyptic (old tech viewed as magic, hidden connections with the long-past that are invisible to the narrator but of profound significance to the reader) is sure-footed and brilliant, and much appreciated by me, because old-tech-posing-as-magic is a trope I happen to love.

Most of all, Engine Summer is a beautiful book and a beautiful story. Crowley’s language – his landscape-writing especially – is the hook it all hangs on, the hook that kept me, well, hooked even in those early stages when I wasn’t sure about the rest of it. In laying out, further exploring and ultimately revealing its central conceit, Crowley’s novel is masterful – at no point could any science fiction purist accuse Crowley of taking refuge in either the stolidly mimetic or the overtly fantastical. That it is also masterful as a piece of text, in maintaining and indeed glorying in its core components – language and form – is a much needed poke in the side of anyone, and I mean from whichever side of the barricades, who insists on insisting that science fiction cannot be literature.

Blink said: ‘It was as though a great sphere of many-colored glass had been floated above the world by the unimaginable effort and power of the angels, so beautiful and strange and so needful of service to keep afloat that for them there was nothing else, and the world was forgotten by them as they watched it float. Now the sphere is gone, smashed in the Storm, and we are left with the old world as it always was, save for a few wounds that can never be healed. But littered all around this old ordinary world, scattered through the years by that smashing, lost in the strangest places and put to the oddest uses, are bits and pieces of that great sphere; bits to hold up to the sun and look through and marvel at – but which can never be put back together again.’

See what I mean about it being difficult to believe this book is four decades old? I came out of Engine Summer on a kind of high, feeling energised and nourished and excited and so glad I’d read it. Reading around and behind the book afterwards, i discovered that Ted Chiang cites Engine Summer as a formative work for him, and I’m not at all surprised. In an interview I read with him at The Believer, Chiang makes a comment I think more or less sums up the approach taken by Crowley in his science fiction, but that also seems to encapsulate for me, in a manner I’ve never found so satisfyingly and succinctly expressed, the essential difference between the speculative and the mimetic:

“Science fiction is known for the sense of wonder it can engender, and I think that sense of wonder is something that is generated by stories of conceptual breakthrough. I don’t know if a sense of wonder is engendered by stories of personal epiphany.”

Chiang uses ‘conceptual breakthrough’ here to mean making a discovery that allows the reader to understand the world in a different way, to consider the possibilities for change or development that such a conceptual breakthrough might allow. Looking back on my own reading, I can see it has been these kinds of breakthroughs – intellectual epiphanies, maybe, as opposed to personal epiphanies – that have provided my most energising and memorable moments of engagement with the genre.

Chiang is also great in describing what it is that makes him identify as a science fiction writer rather than simply a writer:

Genre is a conversation between authors, between books, that extends over decades. And one of the reasons I definitely identify as a science fiction writer is because I want to be a participant in the ongoing conversation that is science fiction. My writing is informed by the books I’ve read, so it is a response to what other writers have written. I want to be in conversation with other works of science fiction.” 

The full interview is here, and very worthy of your time.

I also made time to read Paul Park’s A City Made of Words (2019), one of the very excellent chapbooks in the Outspoken Authors series from PM Press. Each of these chapbooks features at least one previously unpublished story as well as an author interview, bibliography and other scarce material and one could gain a fantastic overview of what science fiction is ‘about’ and what it is capable of, simply by reading the volumes in this series. (Now there’s a project waiting to happen.)

Like John Crowley, Paul Park is an author clearly interested in stretching science fiction well beyond its generic envelope, and the results, for me, have made him a touchstone author. I hadn’t previously read any of the stories in A City Made of Words, but the metafictional techniques and original spins on traditional tropes familiar to me from previous encounters with Park’s work are all present and deployed to superb effect. In ‘A Conversation with the Author’ for example, what starts out looking like exactly what it says in the title quickly morphs into a surreal interrogation scene, in which the titular author is subjected to far more than just the standard interview techniques as the questioner attempts to wrest from him his professional secrets:

‘Let me sum up,’ I said. ‘According to you, the study of fiction writing is important to literary scholars, or might be if they agreed with you. The techniques of your discipline are important to essayists, or might be if they studied them. In addition, you have noticed many ancillary benefits. But the one thing you cannot claim is any improvement to your students’ work. Would that be a fair assessment?’

And then after a moment: ‘Why do you think that is?’ This is how quickly the cancer spreads. I was curious despite myself.

And like many people in his situation he seemed eager to speak, to take me into his confidence in order to improve his chances. Though perhaps he had been storing up some venom for a long time. ‘Because it’s based on lies! The things we teach people, it’s not what we do! No writer in the world takes our advice, or at least no good one. Plot, idea, character, tone, voice, setting, description, exposition – no one thinks about those things. It is a vocabulary invented by idiots to describe concepts that don’t exist. No one has any ‘ideas’, and if they do, they’re a waste of time. Once you start asking yourself how to do something, you can’t do it anymore.’

Glorious, hilarious, and never a truer word. Other stories in the volume include the densely knotty ‘A Resistance to Theory’ in which a scholar attempts to investigate the death of her supervisor literally through the theories of the linguistic philosophers she is studying. How Park manages to sustain this I have no idea but it’s brilliant. Still more brilliant is that the story is also a riff on Buffy the Vampire Slayer. For a (slightly) more traditional science fiction story, ‘The Microscopic Eye’ is both ingenious and moving – a perfect demonstration of Chiang’s conceptual breakthrough theory in just a few pages. Reading Park always leaves me both full and hungry for more – and there’s enough in this short book to engage the mind and the imagination long after reading.

For one final recommendation from my reading this week, please turn your attention to an essay by Rob Latham in the Los Angeles Review of Books. Amidst the slew of pandemic and post-pandemic reading lists, think pieces and calls to arms, Latham’s ‘Zones of Possibility: Science Fiction and the Coronavirus‘, which examines George Stewart’s 1949 science fiction classic Earth Abides within the context of the present moment, stands out for its clarity, intelligence and knowledge of its subject matter, not to mention the fact that it is beautifully written.

‘And this is what science fiction as a genre has to offer us: not blueprints for specific futures, but rather a radical openness to change itself, a willingness to shed old habits and expectations and embrace the new,’ Latham says towards the end of his essay. One of the stranger phenomena – though perhaps not a surprising one – that has come to define these weeks and months is an upsurge in popular interest in science fiction, a curiosity about what science fiction might have to tell us about our current predicament. I hope this interest and curiosity will be lasting, one of the things we bring with us as we move out of lockdown. A willingness to ask questions, and to look in new places. To see where the limits are, and push beyond them.

Day of reckoning

The end of the year has yielded some marvellous reading. I’ve been saving Helen Oyeyemi’s Gingerbread until now, because the very title makes me think of Christmas (the parts of it I still enjoy, frost and music mainly, and, well, gingerbread) and because her close-knit, somehow private prose has a wintry feel, at least for me, by which I mean the scent of woodsmoke and the way Rothesay Bay looks – like the lagoon in The Land that Time Forgot – when it’s shrouded in mist.

Oyeyemi’s Gingerbread is all those things. It’s also a novel that is supported by an undercurrent of deep anger, wrapped about so tightly in coloured lights and party games you might not notice it. There’s a scene in the book where a bunch of helpless girls are being bullied by a bunch of other, momentarily more powerful girls, who make the tormented ones laugh and smile while they’re being pinched and manhandled, so the adults (and the watching cameras) will not realise what’s actually going on. The whole of Gngerbread is like this, and this is its subject matter.

I could call Oyeyemi a clever writer or a subversive writer or a writer of startling originality and while she is all of these things, what she is most is a writer who is intent on following her own interests, her own concerns, her own manner of expression, with barely a thought for the ‘literary establishment’ or what might be popular or acceptable or ‘now’. Her work is discursive, densely wound as a ball of wool and sometimes as difficult to untangle. There are moments when it’s tiring to read, to stick with it, because it’s so much its own thing, showing so little concern for what I might be thinking or feeling, but that’s what makes Oyeyemi’s writing rewarding, that’s what makes it important. I’m also guessing that’s what makes it so much less talked about and discussed and rewarded with prizes (am I mistaken in thinking that Oyeyemi has never yet been shortlisted for a major prize?) than it should be.

We have a magician in our midst. I know she won’t care about prizes, which is why I’m giving myself permission to care on her behalf. What she cares about is the writing, the doing of it, the thinking, the following of a thread of an idea (or a trail of breadcrumbs, if we really must) wherever it leads her. The placing of one word in front of another, an outpouring of imagery so rich and so personal it might communicate to some as dissonance, but that is in reality as careful and considered and skilful as the aligning and mortaring of bricks to build a fortress wall.

She is unique and she is wayward and she is to be treasured. I watched an interview with her recently on YouTube in which many of those qualities shine out strongly, most of all her insistence on being allowed the head-space to say what she actually means, rather than being pushed towards repeating the slew of steady, ready answers to familiar questions that inevitably accrue in our minds when we’ve done even a couple of author events, let alone a book tour. Again, treasure. I was interested, though afterwards not surprised, to hear her mention Jesse Ball as a favourite writer. Just a week or so ago I read his most recent novel The Divers’ Game, and though opposite to Oyeyemi in some ways – so pared down it’s like glass, or granite, with the immaculate sheen of poetry – in the quality of its writing it possesses that same waywardness, that same fierce, you might even say stubborn insistence on being what it is, that is, an almost icily accurate representation of what the writer is actually thinking, actually feeling.

Not a summary, not a pruned-back, dumbed-down approximation, but the real deal. A brutal and terrifying portrayal of dystopia and moral laziness and yet at the same time – can I even say this? – still somehow hopeful, The Divers’ Game should win every science fiction award out there in 2020. My prediction is that it won’t be shortlisted even for one.

I am thinking of these two writers especially today because they give me courage. They give me courage to believe that it is possible, as a writer, to enter the places you need to enter, to explore the realms of thought and language you feel bound to explore.

To say what we have to say, regardless of how it might be received, what worth might be placed upon it by others. To follow what we believe to be true, and to keep on going.

Season of the Witch

Whilst the non-fulfilment of Boris Johnson’s ‘do or die’ pledge is being held up as one of those celebratory, gather-around-the-campfire moments we can all find some solace in, it has begun to feel increasingly to me like an evasion. I don’t want to say a pointless postponement because I’m hoping – along with millions of others – that this will not be the case, although what exactly I am hoping for becomes increasingly unclear. I’m a staunch Remainer who has come to distrust the word, not only because of the way it has been turned into a slur by the hardline Right, but also because of the way it sorts me into a camp, pitting me against others rather than allowing me to talk with and try to understand them.

I feel contempt and anger for the lies spread about by the ultra-Leavers, not just the lies about Remainers and how we’re all about corporate capitalism but the still more damaging lies about immigration, about what a trade deal with Trump’s US, for example, might actually look like, what it would inevitably do to the social and environmental fabric of the country those behind the Leave campaign believes they are being so vigorous in defending. Not that we’d be offered such a trade deal, except on terms so mortifying I’d hope even the ur-Slytherin Dominic Cummings wouldn’t dare to advocate for it, but still. The Remain campaign though – as throughout the referendum itself – seems to have become increasingly self-righteous, increasingly divisive, increasingly intolerant, with this week’s meltdown in the People’s Vote ranks being only the most recent example.

We have a breathing-space extension to the Hallowe’en Extension, great. But with a scant six weeks between December 12 and January 31 and with Christmas and Hogmanay slap in the middle, where exactly is the upcoming general election going to land us?

In an era where the very idea of the nation state is going to become increasingly irrelevant, we need Corbyn’s policies, need them badly – but with the deep seam of intolerance, secrecy, gaslighting and reverse-bigotry splitting the heart of Corbyn’s Labour, I can’t imagine the circumstances under which he’d be able to deliver on his manifesto or even be capable of holding a government together. What we need is not ideology but caution, tolerance, above all far-sightedness. My own electoral dilemma is easily solved, because I live in Scotland. I’ll be voting SNP no matter what, for their policies on education, health and social care and for their solidly progressive green agenda as much as for their stance on Scottish independence. But when I begin to get the sense that the only power we have up here is to shore up the metaphorical Hadrian’s Wall we have built for ourselves through our SNP mandate, that is not a good feeling. What might be coming for us from down south? Johnson’s contempt for – or indifference towards, depending on how you interpret it – Scotland is self evident, but then Corbyn sees us only as a bolt-on, another bloc vote to be corralled and subdued. (Some chance.)

I have no answers, only more questions. Not a comfortable feeling but perhaps that’s as it should be. On the up side, it is Hallowe’en, the last bright blaze of autumnal fire before the frosts of winter (although we’ve already begun with the frosts up here, thanks). So let’s gather around that camp fire and tell some ghost stories.

*

I read this article about the resurgence of witchcraft in literature just before the Worldcon and found a lot to think about. Witches do seem to be having a moment right now, which is a good thing, not least because witches are far more interesting in terms of story than vampires or zombies. Dare I say they bring us hope, a sense of something vital and necessary and important to our society. I agree wholeheartedly with Cosslett, that the witch is well worth celebrating and exploring both as a symbol of women’s power and resistance to tyranny as well as a deeply rooted aspect of fairy tale and mythology. The witch is currently in the ascendant, and goddess knows we need her. But on this day of all days, we would do well to remember the reality of what the word ‘witch’ can mean, not only for the women of centuries past but still – sometimes, some places – today. The word witch has not only been a slur, it has been an accusation, a means of control, a name for hatred, a prelude to imprisonment, torture and government-sanctioned murder. Some of our witches are still fighting to be remembered, to be seen in the eyes of the society that condemned and killed them.

And we should also remember not all of them were women.

Let’s light a Hallowe’en candle for the witch still living in fear as well as for those celebrating the timely revival of all the downtrodden voices they represent. In her superb poetry collection WITCH – my standout discovery from Cosslett’s piece in the Guardian – Rebecca Tamas has done just that. This cycle of poems draws inspiration from all aspects of witchcraft – the traumatic, the incandescent, the morally ambiguous, the self-renewing – to present a blisteringly brutal revelation of what the word means. I’ve been reading a lot of poetry in 2019 (bonus recommendation: Fiona Benson’s luminescent Vertigo and Ghost, which is also quite witchy) and WITCH looks like being one of my favourite books of the year.

With the witch renaissance in full flower, there’s no shortage of crafty book recommendations for All Hallows Eve. Firstly, I’d like to focus attention once again on Sarah Maria Griffin’s Other Words for Smoke, which in terms of modern representation of witches is as powerful as anyone could hope for. The language is gorgeous and the story is compelling, the world evoked both terrifying and beautiful. I loved this book, which deserves to become as famous as Alan Garner’s The Owl Service (which is equally to be recommended and definitely witchy).

If you haven’t caught up with Catriona Ward’s Shirley Jackson Award-winning, British Fantasy Award-winning second novel Little Eve yet, let tonight be the night. Ward has a phenomenal talent, her feel for language so steadfastly in service of her riveting plotlines as to be inseparable from them. I read this book in a single sitting and found it genuinely chilling. Knowing that Ward is currently at work on a new book makes it doubly exciting to revisit this one.

If you’re already fed up with the cold, and enjoy a generous leavening of metafiction with your horror (I know I do) then William Gay’s masterful Southern Gothic Little Sister Death is your perfect match. I cannot overstate how much I loved this book, how closely it’s stuck with me since. The first chapter is one of the most exquisite feats of suspense writing I’ve ever come across, and the novel as it progresses does not renege on this initial promise. Like Little Eve, this is a story of cults and kinship and buried truths. It is also a novel about the implications and possible dangers of rooting out those truths. It’s a book about writing, and writing horror in particular. Little Sister Death is not just for Hallowe’en, she’s with you for life.

If you’re off to a Hallowe’en party and don’t have time to read a complete novel this evening, I would recommend you get yourself into the groove with a story or two from Georgina Bruce’s collection This House of Wounds. I’ve not quite finished reading it yet, but oh my goodness, this is something special. I don’t normally go in for these kind of overly simplistic comparisons but Bruce’s writing truly does read as if Eimear McBride and Livia Llewellyn had a baby! Bruce has been gradually building her reputation in weird short fiction for some years now and this collection marks a significant staging post in her career. The stories in This House of Wounds are richly allegorical, formally innovative, thought-provoking and ambiguous. All the things I love, in other words. If this isn’t on every awards ballot next year then the witches will be rising in rebellion…

If you’re heading to the cinema in search of Hallowe’en hell-raising, forgo the seasonal shlock-fests and reboots (fun though they always are on an evening like this) and go see Joker instead. ‘S all I’m saying.

For some musical accompaniment on your nightly revels, might I be so bold as to offer you this – a playlist for The Dollmaker that I recently compiled for largehearted boy. This is more wistful, mist-ful Hallowe’en than your full John Carpenter, but there are some ghosts here, some dark and twisted tales, an elf-queen or two. I loved picking out the tracks for this and I think that taken together they do convey something of the strangeness and longing that lie at the heart of Andrew and Bramber’s search for one another. I hope you enjoy them.

For me, it’s Cabin in the Woods (again) and a dram of single malt. Happy Hallowe’en!

The Pisces by Melissa Broder

I was trying to ask her in a roundabout way if it was worth it. We felt the same nothingness, of that I was sure. But I wanted to see if she knew we were going to be okay or not. Or, at least, if I was. I was asking life advice, couched in the language of suicide, from a friend in a mental hospital. This was the direction my life had taken.

I picked up this book just prior to going to Worldcon. My choice was no accident. I’ve been enjoying reader reviews of The Pisces for some months now – the way this novel has divided opinion has made me insatiably curious about it – and I thought it would be a suitable companion for my first trip to Ireland. I wasn’t wrong. ‘Perfect summer read’ is not the kind of descriptive language I would normally go in for but in all the best possible ways – it’s set in California, it’s about a holiday romance with a merman – The Pisces is exactly that.

Magical, provocative, hilarious. I loved this book so much more than I ever expected to.

Lucy has accidentally broken up with her boyfriend, Jamie. She’s also stuck – interminably stuck – on her doctoral thesis, an exploration of silence in the work of Sappho. When her sister Annika suggests she spend the summer dog-sitting at her home in Venice Beach, Lucy can’t think of a reasonable excuse to say no, not even when Annika enrolls her in a group therapy circle attended by women driven to distraction by their pursuit of unavailable men.

It is only when Lucy meets Theo that the stage is set for romance of a more mythic variety. Is Theo simply the best sex of her life, or the embodiment of what Lucy, Sarah, Claire and maybe even Dr Jude are all secretly looking for: perfect love?

Negative critics of The Pisces seems to fall into two distinct brackets: those who dislike the explicit and occasionally startling portrayal of sex and the body that characterises the first half of the book especially, and those who find the characters – Lucy especially – unlikable and ungenerous. There is no doubt that the tone of Lucy’s narrative is bracing, not to say caustic, but rarely have I found a novel or a protagonist that speaks so honestly and with such deft, dark humour about what it is really like for a woman to grow up and come of age in a society which values her attractiveness to men, her ability to get and keep a man – scrap that, shall we just say MEN? above all else.

Such a (hilarious) relief, to see men – naked – through the female gaze for once. So poignant, such a vindication to have the corrosive effects of love addiction and the low personal esteem at its root dragged out into the open.

If some have called The Pisces savage and unfeminist, I call it savagely healing and one of the most unapologetically feminist novels I’ve read.

That the novel simultaneously plays out as a mysterious and satisfying work of speculative fiction makes it doubly pleasurable. As an examination of the habits of mer-people – how they see themselves reflected in our literature and through the lens of the human gaze – The Pisces is a delight, a ludic romance of ideas and mythology. Our discovery that Theo’s siren call turns out to be just that – a calculated seduction, a descent into delusion with potentially deadly consequences – leads us ultimately towards an ending that feels rewarding and true.

It makes a certain kind of sense to group this book with recent novels by Ottessa Moshfegh (My Year of Rest and Relaxation) Laura Sims (Looker) and Halle Butler (The New Me) – novels that have all boldly examined the female condition from the inside out. What makes The Pisces my favourite of an exceptional bunch is its leap into the vaster spaces of the fantastic. Lucy’s thoughts on Sappho are marvellously rendered, the novel’s understated satire on the self-serving nature of academe both delicious and accurate. The Pisces was a delight for me in every way, a further revelation of the versatility and imaginative richness of speculative ideas.

All Hallows Eve!

In celebration of Hallowe’en, here’s the interview piece I put together for Black Static #65 about Catriona Ward’s scintillating second novel Little Eve – your Hallowe’en reading, sorted!

*

Little Eve: an interview with Catriona Ward

 When I heard that Catriona Ward had a new novel coming out, I felt nervous as well as excited. Her debut had been exceptional. Set on Dartmoor during the tumultuous apotheosis of the Victorian age, Rawblood was a philosophical drama disguised in the costume of high gothic, exploding on to the British horror scene in 2015 as an instant classic. Rawblood expertly combined elements of the traditional ghost story – the isolated house, the family curse, the doomed quest for arcane knowledge – with a deeply felt social insight that, together with Ward’s expressive, lyrical writing and passion for story, set it apart from other essays in period horror and signalled the arrival of a major talent.

By her own admission, Rawblood was for Ward a passion project. Inspired by the landscapes that defined her childhood and the stories and novels that helped to form her both as a thinker and as a writer, her debut took more than seven years to write and went through dramatic evolutionary changes in the process. The end result reveals none of the doubts, reversals and sheer hard graft that would inevitably have accompanied its journey into print. In terms of its language, style and formal innovation, Rawblood feels so fully achieved it is difficult to believe it is a debut. But there is more to Rawblood than a great story, professionally told: the book also comes across as deeply personal, a genuine culmination of a writer’s vision. This is rarer than you might think, especially in genre fiction, where new writers are coming under increasing pressure from agents and editors to deliver novels that they feel will satisfy market expectations.

Rawblood found considerable success, both with genre aficionados and also with a more mainstream audience, readers who might not normally have felt entirely comfortable picking up a horror novel. I was proud to be a member of the jury that awarded Rawblood the 2016 British Fantasy Award for best horror novel. I was eager to see what Ward would produce next, yet at the same time I felt anxious for her. An author’s first book is written largely in isolation, and in most cases is not subject to a deadline. The follow-up – the ‘difficult second novel’ – is another matter. You won’t normally be given seven years to write it, for a start. And if you’ve done your job properly the first time around as Ward did, you might also have acquired some fans, all excitedly scouring the internet for news of your next publication date. You’re not alone any more – a fact that is deeply gratifying but also a pressure. Suddenly, there is a weight of expectation that, inevitably, some writers will struggle to fulfil.

The good news for all of us is that Catriona Ward has fulfilled it, in spades. Her second novel, Little Eve, is just as good as Rawblood, if not better. I was lucky enough to be sent an advance proof, and am delighted to report that for the six hours or so it took me to read it, I quite literally did nothing else. This does not happen often.

For writers, the increasing tendency to relate to books as text to be analysed, scrutinised and criticised can make it difficult to suspend disbelief, to recapture the pure reading pleasure that characterises our encounters with the novels and stories that made us writers in the first place. While reading Little Eve, I truly felt myself to be a reader again.

The stylistic achievement that marked out Rawblood as something special is equally assured. Ward’s sense of place, her rapturous, almost dream-like evocation of characters in a landscape is immersive and bewitching. But for all its beauty of language, Little Eve works equally successfully as a page-turning thriller. Again, this does not happen often, and Catriona Ward should be congratulated on producing another novel that will be beloved of both seasoned horror fans and more mainstream literary readers – those unfortunate souls who think they don’t even like horror – alike.

 

The action of Little Eve takes place over a period of some thirty years, from the penultimate year of World War One until the immediate aftermath of World War Two. We move some six hundred miles north, swapping the Dartmoor wilderness of Rawblood for the village community of Loyal and the small offshore island of Altnaharra, north of Inverness, in the Scottish Highlands. The island is home to John Bearings, a man who came north in search of sanctuary for himself and his adoptive ‘family’, a group shunned by the local community on grounds of their supposed immorality even as they are pitied for their material poverty. Early on New Year’s Day 1921, a local man, Jamie McRaith, makes a bloody discovery: John Bearings and his acolytes have all been murdered. The one survivor, a young woman named Dinah, insists that the murderer is her adoptive sister Evelyn, known within the family as Little Eve.

As we move back and forth along the narrative timeline, we discover that the story of what really happened on Altnaharra is stranger and more terrible than it initially appears. It is also far less straightforward. Little Eve is compellingly readable and rich in sonorous gothic sensibility. It is also a thought-provoking indictment of the British class system, the position of women in Edwardian society and the wilful blindness and skewed morality of enclosed communities. Ward has created an unforgettable cast of characters. Her vision is unflinching, the story she tells is wrenching and raw, which is not to belie the powerful lyricism of her writing. On finishing the novel, I found myself buzzing with theories and suppositions, alternative trains of thought. I sat down and wrote to Catriona with some questions about Little Eve, which she has been good enough to answer for us here.

 

NINA ALLAN: The first thing we notice about Little Eve is its setting. As with the Villarca house in Rawblood, the island of Altnaharra is an isolated outpost in an already inhospitable location. The Dartmoor of your first novel is a defining presence, and you have spoken many times in interview of the importance of Dartmoor in your personal and in your writing life. Both the village of Loyal and the island of Altnaharra are imaginary, yet the sense of place that permeates Little Eve is as vivid and as vital to the story as the real places of Rawblood. Why did you choose to set Little Eve in the Scottish Highlands, and what came first, the location or the story?

CATRIONA WARD: Dartmoor is deeply embedded in Rawblood, and vice versa. It’s part of my emotional landscape and the setting of many of my dreams. I wanted to infuse the text with that. Longing for and memory of place is such an important part of Rawblood, the novel is an extended hymn to home.

I don’t know the Highlands in the same intimate way. It was a lack of familiarity that Little Eve needed. There’s an unease to the characters’ relationship with their setting. The Children are strangers in Scotland, invaders and also prisoners. Also, Highland place names are so wonderful – some I invented, like Loyal, but others like Tongue, Altnaharra and Ardentinny I merely borrowed. From the first and for all sorts of reasons, the idea for Little Eve was inextricable from the Highlands setting.

NA: As well as the gothic elements, Little Eve also involves some of the tropes of classic golden age detective fiction. In Christopher Black we have the obsessive, ostracised investigator, whose career has been ruined by his relentless quest for the truth about John Bearings and his adopted family. The closed, intimate circle of suspects, the theme of mistaken identity – the spirit of Wilkie Collins’s The Woman in White hovers over this novel – are also key elements, with the truth about the murders remaining in question right up until the end. Do you enjoy detective fiction, and to what extent did writers like Wilkie Collins, Edgar Allan Poe and even Agatha Christie provide inspiration for Little Eve?

CW: Wilkie Collins is a big inspiration. The Moonstone is both an excellent gothic novel and the original detective story. Detective fiction is the most reassuring genre of all – it provides a problem with a solution and a culprit – an answer. I began Little Eve with a fully evolved detective plot, intending it for a conventional mystery. But you don’t always control what you write. It became something stranger. Agatha Christie meets The Wicker Man, maybe? Crime literature in general has some things in common with the gothic – both genres ask the reader to play detective, to follow a thread to a dark truth. I wanted to draw out some of those commonalities in Little Eve.

NA: The most sinister character in Little Eve is undoubtedly John Bearings himself, yet as readers we always see him at one remove, through the eyes of other, unreliable narrators. Was it a conscious decision of yours, to keep ‘Uncle’ and his monstrous crimes partly obscured by shadow, and if so, why?  

CW: I made a considered decision to deny him a narrative voice. John Bearings doesn’t deserve any time in the light. It’s a feminist act to exclude him from the narrative. Or perhaps I just didn’t want to inhabit him! In the end I found that Little Eve isn’t about him at all, really. It’s about how the women and children under his control suffer and try to survive. It’s about ingenuity, about kindness blooming amidst horror and about faith, though not the kind he peddles.

NA: The position of women in Victorian and Edwardian society is a dominant theme of yours, both in Rawblood and in Little Eve – indeed it could be argued that these novels represent a reclaiming of the gothic for the female voice. Have you ever found yourself frustrated by the way women are portrayed in horror fiction? How far is the balance being redressed now in contemporary works?

CW: I am frequently frustrated by how women are portrayed in all sorts of genres! Horror still relies heavily on portrayals of vulnerable women. There’s a prurience to a certain type of horror gaze. But I think the gothic sidesteps that quite cleverly and has always naturally lent itself to the female voice. It’s a knowing, sometimes quite wry genre that illustrates the horror of power, usually male power. I wish that as a society had we had outgrown the need for such fictional mirrors to be held up to life… but we definitely haven’t.

NA: Scientific explanations for supernatural phenomena, and the apparent conflict between faith and rational argument form key plot elements in both Rawblood and Little Eve. This conflict and the instability of its resolution has always loomed large in gothic writing – Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein springs immediately to mind, so does R.L. Stevenson’s The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Do you see horror and science as natural bedfellows, and why might this be?

CW: Horror and science resemble one another so closely, at times. The history of scientific discovery, particularly in medicine and pathology, is truly horrible. James Marion Sims developed pioneering gynaecological techniques still used today – by performing experimental surgeries on twelve slave women without anaesthesia. Only three of the women’s names are recorded – Anarcha, Betsy and Lucy. We should remember them.

The idea of a dialogue between the rational and supernatural, or faith and science, is part of the bedrock of gothic literature, as you say. But these are not discrete concepts. They all bleed into one another – and they are all attempts to circumvent mortality. The gothic recognises that all these strategies will ultimately fail. It looks uncomfortable realities in the face – which is why it’s such a powerful genre. It goes to the heart of things.

NA: What draws you particularly to historical fiction? Do you see horror essentially as period drama, or might you feel tempted to relocate to a contemporary setting at some point in the future?

CW: Historical fiction can serve as a lens, casting a particular light on the now. Period drama helps us parse today. And I feel a need to distance myself from my characters’ situations. Writing is so intimate and the further I remove the narrative from my own external concerns, the freer I feel to explore my protagonists’ inner ones. A good way of doing that is to embed the novel deeply in another time. But I’m trying something new, at the moment – I’m in the midst of my third novel, which is contemporary, and told from the point of view of a serial killer’s cat. I am really enjoying writing as a cat.

NA: You have spoken of your admiration for classic gothic texts such as Charles Maturin’s Melmoth the Wanderer and Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre but who, for you, are the most exciting voices in contemporary horror?

CW: There seems to be horror in all good art – some of the authors I’m drawn to might not be perceived as strictly ‘genre.’ Kelly Link manages a powerful alchemy, mingling magical realism with everyday horrors and using the language of genre. I can never quite work out how she does what she does. Gemma Files is wonderful, as is Michelle Paver, and Lauren Beukes. Justin Cronin’s the Passage saga is epic and immersive – it was a wrench to leave that world, at the end. I was glued to my seat during ‘Get Out’ – what an original idea, brilliantly executed.

 

(Catriona Ward’s Little Eve is published by Weidenfeld & Nicholson)

Home to Roost

I don’t think it is any coincidence at all that we are living through a new golden age of horror fiction. In a recent review of Jac Jemc’s well-nigh perfect work of rural unease, The Grip of It, I recalled the horror boom of the seventies and eighties, kick-started by the publication of Stephen King’s debut novel Carrie in 1974, spluttering to a halt in the 1990s through massive grunge overload. The ultimate effect of this boom-and-bust on horror writers was pretty disastrous, leading as it did to an extended period – twenty years, more or less – during which it was practically impossible for even the best writers to sell a horror novel.

Looking back on that period now, we can observe how horror did not actually go away, but rather evolved. The Stephen King brand of horror – let’s call it baby boomer horror – focused closely and brilliantly on small town anxieties, childhood trauma, the undermining of common decency through unholy powers. It reflected the anxieties of its age, in other words – the violent overthrow of old certainties, the dawning of new perils in a post-Hiroshima, post-Vietnam world. We see this clearly in the American horror cinema of the time – John Carpenter’s Halloween, Tobe Hooper’s The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, George A. Romero’s zombie movies – which closely parallels the themes and style of King’s fiction. Much has been written about how the 70s boom degenerated into splatterpunk and died – for more on this do read this excellent essay by Steffen Hantke on the Dell Abyss series (and please read Kathe Koja’s The Cipher if you haven’t already) – but what actually happened, eventually, was that 70s horror and its small-town ambience bifurcated into urban fantasy on the one hand (think Buffy, Twilight, Neverwhere) and the serial killer thriller on the other. While both these trends are still very much with us, they have done what trends do and become established, therefore comfortable. We know what to expect from them and – continue to enjoy them as we might – in terms of what is new now in horror fiction they have little to offer.

In the wake of the splatterpunk implosion, horror literature became a no-go zone for mainstream publishers. You could still buy King and Koontz, but everyone else interested in writing horror fiction was pushed back into small press imprints, most with poor distribution and close to zero visibility in the marketplace. Writers will keep writing though, and while many of the authors who enjoyed a precarious overnight success during the boom years disappeared from the field (thank God) with equal rapidity, in the pages of the Year’s Best horror anthologies, a new generation of writers were coming to prominence.

Perhaps inevitably, much of the new horror fiction of the early noughties chose to discard the shiny excesses of shopping mall horror, returning instead to older certainties and classic themes. The Elder Gods were much in evidence as writers such as Caitlin R. Kiernan and Laird Barron opened the eyes of a new generation to the vast and eerie possibilities of Lovecraftian cosmic horror. The literature of the ‘bad place’ – the haunted house novel, in other words – also began enjoying a renaissance, and it is here that we begin to see the first manifestations of the horror literature that is now enjoying its own boom in the 2010s and, we would hope, on into the 2020s.

What makes this time different from the last time? I would argue that this new horror is more adult, more serious in intent, and therefore more durable. In their stories of urban decay and alienation, horror writers now are not content merely to reflect social anxiety in their fiction, they want actively to engage with it. Horror archetypes, it seems, are among the most useful and flexible for the purposes of quantifying what is going so badly wrong with the way we live now. But what most differentiates this new horror from the pop horror of the 80s and 90s is, above all, its tenacious sense of place.

The very mention of sense of place lends an impression of solidity, fixedness. We speak also of ‘spirit of place’, a concept infused with the numinous, an identification with the ancient ineffable that writers of the first wave of weird fiction – Machen, Blackwood, Bierce, even M. R. James – would have us believe is somehow ‘in the blood’. Later writers such as Aickman, while masterfully reinforcing the notion that places are strange, also went some way to exploring how slippery and, yes, dangerous such concepts can be, how close to delusion and the kind of mythmaking that foregrounds exclusion and demonises difference. The ground beneath our feet, ironically, has never been as threatened as it is today. As ambient, ever-present anxieties over climate change, plastic pollution, the wholesale destruction of species and ecosystems become – as they should – ever more the substance and spirit of our horror fiction, we should equally remember that our nostalgia for place and time is not bound up with blood, but with personal memory. These places are special to us not because we ‘belong there’ so much as because we were born there, lived there, read stories from there, watched them concrete there over. Which is to say, we all belong wherever there might be, whether we possess an old daguerreotype of our great-great-great-grandparents posed carefully in the living room of the house down the road, or whether we moved in next door only yesterday.

How can we truly belong if we do not protect – which is to say, protect everyone, every species? Even as it is in our nature as writers, humans and chroniclers to cherish our relationship to a particular time and place, to maintain that the arbitrarily defined patch of land we like to call our own is any more ‘special’ than any other is a specious luxury we cannot afford. Even as we croon the old songs, our places are being destroyed. The Elder Gods are close and they are hungry. Horror writers know this. The new horror is a literature not so much of nostalgia as of exposure.

Which brings me, finally, to the point of this essay in drawing attention to a new anthology, which I believe may come to be seen as a landmark in the field. This Dreaming Isle, edited by Dan Coxon for Unsung Stories, brings together a group of writers whose work is intimately concerned not only with sense of place, but with the increasing pressures being brought to bear on our notion of self and belonging – the very concepts that form the core of contemporary horror fiction.

Ramsey Campbell has been writing about this stuff for forty years. A writer who pretty much defines what modern horror is, he was one of the worst affected, in publishing terms, by the collapse of the horror market in the 1990s, yet this has never deterred his output, or damaged his phenomenal ability to plumb the darkest recesses of our crumbling society.

Aliya Whiteley was also hit by shifts in publishing at the beginning of her career. Undaunted, she worked her way back up through the pages of the speculative fiction magazines and anthologies, before publishing two novellas – The Beauty and The Arrival of Missives – that have set a benchmark for quality in new horror fiction and ensured Whiteley’s place as one of the most original voices in the field today.

With the phenomenal success of his debut novel The Loney – a novel of place if ever there was one – Andrew Michael Hurley could be deemed responsible for helping to kick off the new horror boom in the first place. Following closely in his footsteps and with seemingly effortless ease, Catriona Ward has written two back-to-back New Gothic novels rich in geographical specificity, and as good as any that have been published in the past two hundred years. (For more of my thoughts on Cat’s new novel Little Eve, see the next issue of Black Static.) Jenn Ashworth, recently and deservedly named as one of the Royal Society of Literature’s Forty Under Forty, is a phenomenal writer who has never been afraid to utilise horror in talking about class inequality, family, and of course place, while Jeanette Ng, with her 2017 novel Under the Pendulum Sun, has created one of the most imaginative dark fantasy debuts I have ever read, a bold questioning of aspects of faith and belief as well as a provocative and knowledgeable inquiry into the life and work of the Bronte sisters. Co-founder of Influx Press, Gary Budden has been directly instrumental in raising the profile of psychogeography, new weird and strange fiction within a distinctly British context. His own stories, recently showcased in his debut collection Hollow Shores, engage with place, class and memory at a gut level, seeming to morph into something else even as we encounter them.

I would like to reserve a special mention for Alison Moore. Well known in the horror and weird community for some years, Moore was brought to wider public attention in 2012 when her debut novel The Lighthouse was shortlisted for the Booker Prize. Her novel appeared on the shortlist alongside Deborah Levy’s Swimming Home, which like The Lighthouse was notable for being published by an independent press. Deborah Levy has since entered the mainstream, a pioneer of the new autofiction and a regular subject of broadsheet author interviews and think pieces. Moore has continued in her own quiet way to produce novels of striking power, originality and literary achievement, but to far less fanfare. I have made no secret of how much it galls me, that Moore has thus far received only a fraction of the appreciation that is her due. To my mind, Moore’s novels are amongst the most assured and potentially durable in English fiction now. Moreover, they are distinctly less London-centric than Levy’s, portraying ordinary people living ordinary lives in a way that reveals how extraordinary we all are, how unstable and unnerving the times – and the places – we live in. Her most recent book, Missing, is her best yet.

These are just some of the writers who have contributed stories to This Dreaming Isle, which is kickstarting now. Fully funded in less than twenty-four hours, the anthology will be officially launched at this year’s FantasyCon in Chester. I’m looking forward to picking up my copy, and would encourage anyone, anywhere who is interested in new horror, folk horror, the strange and the weird to back it now – we want to see those stretch goals met, after all!

For anyone who might be wondering, Dan Coxon did invite me – several times – to contribute to This Dreaming Isle, but in the end I had to decline due to lack of time available. I do have a story half-written that may yet surface at some point in the future. In the meantime I have written this essay, to show how much I wanted to be a part of this project, and to encourage you to be a part of it too. This is going to be good.

 

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 The Spider's House

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑